1 resultado para Resistance to change
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (32)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Bioline International (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (38)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (40)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (96)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (62)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (4)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (10)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (49)
- Nottingham eTheses (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (9)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (81)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (133)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (15)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (89)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (36)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Consultation is promoted throughout school psychology literature as a best practice in service delivery. This method has numerous benefits including being able to work with more students at one time, providing practitioners with preventative rather than strictly reactive strategies, and helping school professionals meet state and federal education mandates and initiatives. Despite the benefits of consultation, teachers are sometimes resistant to this process.This research studies variables hypothesized to lead to resistance (Gonzalez, Nelson, Gutkin, & Shwery, 2004) and attempts to distinguish differences between school level (elementary, middle and high school) with respect to the role played by these variables and to determine if the model used to identify students for special education services has an influence on resistance factors. Twenty-sixteachers in elementary and middle schools responded to a demographicquestionnaire and a survey developed by Gonzalez, et al. (2004). This survey measures eight variables related to resistance to consultation. No high school teachers responded to the request to participate. Results of analysis of variance indicated a significant difference in the teaching efficacy subscale with elementary teachers reporting more efficacy in teaching than middle school teachers. Results also indicate a significant difference in classroom managementefficacy with teachers who work in schools that identify students according to a Response to Intervention model reporting higher classroom management efficacy than teachers who work in schools that identify students according to a combined method of refer-test-place/RtI combination model. Implications, limitations and directions for future research are discussed.