1 resultado para Policy Process Theory
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (25)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (14)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (14)
- Brock University, Canada (22)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (80)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (38)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (59)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (61)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (11)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (32)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (51)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (17)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (11)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (55)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (10)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (18)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (11)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (34)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (38)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (51)
- University of Washington (3)
Resumo:
The recent rise of the Tea Party movement has added a new dimension to our discussion of domestic politics. The main question is: what effect will the Tea Party have on the political landscape? The best way to answer this question is to place the Tea Party in historical and theoretical context, in order to discuss what type of social movement the Tea Party is and what impact it might have. To this end, I will define and discuss the two major literatures in socialmovement theory: Issue Evolution and Political Process theory. This theoretical framework will provide the basis for a more concrete definition of the Tea Party movement itself. I will attemptto define the Tea Party movement based on its demographics, goals and political successes and will discuss it within the context of this theoretical framework. In addition, I will discuss four landmark social movements within our country’s history through the lens of the theoretical framework. I have found that successful movements rely on a combination of internal organizations and networks and external political opportunities to achieve and maintain nationalrelevance. In the end, I will come to the conclusion that the Tea Party will not likely have a major lasting impact on the political arena. It lacks key parts of the internal structure that makes some movements, such as the Civil Rights movement, so influential. But in the short term it will succeed in pushing the Republican Party towards a more fiscally conservative position.