1 resultado para Packing for shipment -- Automation
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (14)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (19)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (12)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (4)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (35)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (9)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (12)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (617)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (11)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (24)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Michigan (66)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Simulation is an important resource for researchers in diverse fields. However, many researchers have found flaws in the methodology of published simulation studies and have described the state of the simulation community as being in a crisis of credibility. This work describes the project of the Simulation Automation Framework for Experiments (SAFE), which addresses the issues that undermine credibility by automating the workflow in the execution of simulation studies. Automation reduces the number of opportunities for users to introduce error in the scientific process thereby improvingthe credibility of the final results. Automation also eases the job of simulation users and allows them to focus on the design of models and the analysis of results rather than on the complexities of the workflow.