1 resultado para Hatch-Waxman Act
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Rhode Island School of Design (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- Archive of European Integration (42)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (20)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (26)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (35)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (19)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (12)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (18)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (74)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (162)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (14)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (325)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (16)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
Resumo:
This study examined the impact of the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 on resident-and-facility-level risk factors for physical restraint use in nursing homes. Data on the 1990 and 1993 cohorts were obtained from 268 facilities in 10 states, and data on a 1996 cohort were obtained from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which sampled more than 800 nursing homes nationwide. Multivariate logistic regression models were generated for each cohort to identify the impact of resident- and facility-level risk factors for restraint use. The results indicate that the use of physical restraints continues to decline. Thirty-six percent of the 1990 cohort, 26 percent of the 1993 cohort, and 17 percent of the 1996 cohort were physically restrained. Although there was a reduced rate of restraint use from 1990 to 1996, similar resident-level factors but different facility-level factors were associated with restraint use at different points in time.