1 resultado para Food choices
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (7)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (153)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (5)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (17)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (7)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (57)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (25)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (13)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (26)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (58)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (64)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (53)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (328)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
The rise of new food assistance instruments, including local and regional procurement, cash, and vouchers, has surpassed increase in understanding of the tradeoffs among and impacts of these options relative to traditional food aid. Response choices rarely appear to result from systematic response analyses. Further, impacts along multiple dimensions-timeliness, cost-effectiveness, local market effects, recipient satisfaction, food quality, impact on smallholder suppliers, etc.-may be competing or synergistic. No single food assistance tool is always and everywhere preferable. A growing body of evidence, including the papers in this special section, nonetheless demonstrates the clear value-added of new food assistance instruments. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.