Relevance of In-vitro Tests of Adhesive and Composite Dental Materials. A Review in 3 Parts. Part 2: Non-standardized tests of composite materials

Summary The first part of this review examined ISO approval requirements and in vitro testing. In the second part, non-standardized test methods for composite materials are presented and discussed. Physical tests are primarily described. Analyses of surface gloss and alterations, as well as aging simulations of dental materials are presented. Again, the importance of laboratory tests in determining clinical outcomes is evaluated. Differences in the measurement protocols of the various testing institutes and how these differences can in?uence the results are also discussed. Because there is no standardization of test protocols, the values determined by different institutes cannot be directly compared. However, the ranking of the tested materials should be the same if a valid protocol is applied by different institutes. The modulus of elasticity, the expansion after water sorption, and the polishability of the material are all clinically relevant, whereas factors measured by other test protocols may have no clinical correlation. The handling properties of the materials are highly dependent on operators' preferences. Therefore, no standard values can be given.

Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials, a review in 3 parts. Part 1: Approval requirements and standardized testing of composite materials according to ISO specifications

The first part of this three-part review on the relevance of laboratory testing of composites and adhesives deals with approval requirements for composite materials. We compare the in vivo and in vitro literature data and discuss the relevance of in vitro analyses. The standardized ISO protocols are presented, with a focus on the evaluation of physical parameters. These tests all have a standardized protocol that describes the entire test set-up. The tests analyse flexural strength, depth of cure, susceptibility to ambient light, color stability, water sorption and solubility, and radiopacity. Some tests have a clinical correlation. A high flexural strength, for instance, decreases the risk of fractures of the marginal ridge in posterior restorations and incisal edge build-ups of restored anterior teeth. Other tests do not have a clinical correlation or the threshold values are too low, which results in an approval of materials that show inferior clinical properties (e.g., radiopacity). It is advantageous to know the test set-ups and the ideal threshold values to correctly interpret the material data. Overall, however, laboratory assessment alone cannot ensure the clinical success of a product.

Pore-water squeezing from indurated shales

High-pressure mechanical squeezing was applied to sample pore waters from a sequence of highly indurated and overconsolidated sedimentary rocks in a drillcore from a deep borehole in NE Switzerland. The rocks are generally rich in clay minerals (28–71 wt.%), with low water contents of 3.5–5.6 wt.%, resulting in extremely low hydraulic conductivities of 10− 14–10− 13 m/s. First pore-water samples could generally be taken at 200 MPa, and further aliquots were obtained at 300, 400 and 500 MPa. Chemical and isotopic compositions of squeezed waters evolve with increasing pressure. Decreasing concentrations of Cl−, Br−, Na+ and K+ are explained by ion filtration due to the collapse of the pore space during squeezing. Increasing concentrations of Ca2 + and Mg2 + are considered to be a consequence of pressure-dependent solubilities of carbonate minerals in combination with sorption/desorption reactions. The pressure dependence was studied by model calculations considering equilibrium with carbonate minerals and the exchanger population on clay surfaces, and the trends observed in the experiments could be confirmed. The compositions of the squeezed waters were compared with results of independent methods, such as aqueous extraction and in-situ sampling of ground and pore waters. On this basis, it is concluded that the chemical and isotopic composition of pore water squeezed at the lowest pressure of 200 MPa closely represents that of the in-situ pore water. The feasibility of sampling pore waters with water contents down to 3.5 wt.% and possibly less opens new perspectives for studies targeted at palaeo-hydrogeological investigations using pore-water compositions in aquitards as geochemical archives.