Acclimatization improves submaximal exercise economy at 5533m

We tested whether the better subjective exercise tolerance perceived by mountaineers after altitude acclimatization relates to enhanced exercise economy. Thirty-two mountaineers performed progressive bicycle exercise to exhaustion at 490 m and twice at 5533 m (days 6–7 and day 11), respectively, during an expedition to Mt. Muztagh Ata. Maximal work rate (Wmax) decreased from mean ± SD 356 ± 73 watts at 490 m to 191 ± 49 watts and 193 ± 45 watts at 5533 m, days 6–7 and day 11, respectively; corresponding maximal oxygen uptakes (VO2max) were 50.7 ± 9.5, 26.3 ± 5.6, 24.7 ± 7.0 mL/min/kg (P = 0.0001 5533 m vs 490 m). On days 6–7 (5533 m), VO2 at 75% Wmax (152 ± 37 watts) was 1.75 ± 0.45 L/min, oxygen saturation 68 ± 8%. On day 11 (5533 m), at the same submaximal work rate, VO2 was lower (1.61 ± 0.47 L/min, P < 0.027) indicating improved net efficiency; oxygen saturation was higher (74 ± 7%, P < 0.0004) but ratios of VO2 to work rate increments remained unchanged. On day 11, mountaineers climbed faster from 4497 m to 5533 m than on days 5–6 but perceived less effort (visual analog scale 50 ± 15 vs 57 ± 20, P = 0.006) and reduced symptoms of acute mountain sickness. We conclude that the better performance and subjective exercise tolerance after acclimatization were related to regression of acute mountain sickness and improved submaximal exercise economy because of lower metabolic demands for non-external work-performing functions.

Response to Innes and Mattsson: Neospora caninum emerges from the shadow of Toxoplasma gondii

It is tempting to extrapolate research findings regarding the intensively studied Toxoplasma gondii to Neospora caninum. This is based on morphological and ultrastructural studies, the molecular phylogeny of both parasites, their wide host ranges in nature, their ability to invade many different cell types in vitro and the occurrence of homologous proteins in both species. However, as Innes and Mattsson point out, T. gondii is the most successful parasite worldwide, whereas N. caninum has a more limited host range. Thus, some of the most challenging questions are: (i) what is T. gondii doing that N. caninum is not doing, or is doing differently, that renders the former so much more successful? And (ii) can some of these features be exploited for the development of interventional tools to limit infection and pathology caused by N. caninum?