Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors increase the production of vascular endothelial growth factor in dental pulp-derived cells

Introduction: Prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) inhibitors can induce a proangiogenic response that stimulates regeneration in soft and hard tissues. However, the effect of PHD inhibitors on the dental pulp is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of PHD inhibitors on the proangiogenic capacity of human dental pulp–derived cells. Methods: To test the response of dental pulp–derived cells to PHD inhibitors, the cells were exposed to dimethyloxalylglycine, desferrioxamine, L-mimosine, and cobalt chloride. To assess the response of dental pulp cells to a capping material supplemented with PHD inhibitors, the cells were treated with supernatants from calcium hydroxide. Viability, proliferation, and protein synthesis were assessed by formazan formation, 3[H]thymidine, and 3[H]leucine incorporation assays. The effect on the proangiogenic capacity was measured by immunoassays for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Results: We found that all 4 PHD inhibitors can reduce viability, proliferation, and protein synthesis at high concentrations. At nontoxic concentrations and in the presence of supernatants from calcium hydroxide, PHD inhibitors stimulated the production of VEGF in dental pulp–derived cells. When calcium hydroxide was supplemented with the PHD inhibitors, the supernatants from these preparations did not significantly elevate VEGF levels. Conclusions: These results show that PHD inhibitors can stimulate VEGF production of dental pulp–derived cells, suggesting a corresponding increase in their proangiogenic capacity. Further studies will be required to understand the impact that this might have on pulp regeneration.

Restorative dentistry and restorative materials over the next 20 years: A Delphi survey

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to forecast trends in restorative dentistry over the next 20 years and to identify treatment goals and corresponding properties of restorative materials. METHODS Using the Delphi method, a panel of 3 experts identified 8 key questions, which were sent to experts in restorative and preventive dentistry. In round 1 of this survey, 15 international experts devised a clearer semantic definition of the key questions and the completion of respective items for two additional rounds. In round 2, 125 experts from 35 countries rated the items developed in round 1 using a Likert scale. In round 3, the same 125 experts received the ratings of round 2 and were asked to agree or disagree to these ratings by re-voting on all key questions and items. A total of 105 experts re-voted and finally took part in the complete survey. Among the 8 key questions, two questions were selected for the present report: (Q1) "What will be the future role of restorative treatment?" and (Q6) "What will be the key qualities for clinical success of restorations?" For both questions and the respective items, the experts were asked to evaluate the importance and the feasibility for later calculation of the scientific value (i.e. the opportunity, where opportunity=importance+[importance-feasibility]). RESULTS The three items of highest importance for Q1 were "preservation of existing enamel and dentin tissue," "prevention of secondary caries," and "maintenance of the pulp vitality," and for Q6 they were "optimization of adhesion," "biocompatibility," and "minimizing technical sensitivity." SIGNIFICANCE Bioactivity toward the pulp-dentin complex and prevention of secondary caries were the items generally rated as having the highest opportunity.