Medroxyprogesterone abrogates the inhibitory effects of estradiol on vascular smooth muscle cells by preventing estradiol metabolism

Sequential conversion of estradiol (E) to 2/4-hydroxyestradiols and 2-/4-methoxyestradiols (MEs) by CYP450s and catechol-O-methyltransferase, respectively, contributes to the inhibitory effects of E on smooth muscle cells (SMCs) via estrogen receptor-independent mechanisms. Because medroxyprogesterone (MPA) is a substrate for CYP450s, we hypothesized that MPA may abrogate the inhibitory effects of E by competing for CYP450s and inhibiting the formation of 2/4-hydroxyestradiols and MEs. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of E on SMC number, DNA and collagen synthesis, and migration in the presence and absence of MPA. The inhibitory effects of E on cell number, DNA synthesis, collagen synthesis, and SMC migration were significantly abrogated by MPA. For example, E (0.1micromol/L) reduced cell number to 51+/-3.6% of control, and this inhibitory effect was attenuated to 87.5+/-2.9% by MPA (10 nmol/L). Treatment with MPA alone did not alter any SMC parameters, and the abrogatory effects of MPA were not blocked by RU486 (progesterone-receptor antagonist), nor did treatment of SMCs with MPA influence the expression of estrogen receptor-alpha or estrogen receptor-beta. In SMCs and microsomal preparations, MPA inhibited the sequential conversion of E to 2-2/4-hydroxyestradiol and 2-ME. Moreover, as compared with microsomes treated with E alone, 2-ME formation was inhibited when SMCs were incubated with microsomal extracts incubated with E plus MPA. Our findings suggest that the inhibitory actions of MPA on the metabolism of E to 2/4-hydroxyestradiols and MEs may negate the cardiovascular protective actions of estradiol in postmenopausal women receiving estradiol therapy combined with administration of MPA.

Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss with long-cycle hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE: Postmenopausal bone loss and osteoporotic fractures can be prevented by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). However, opposed HRT may increase the risk of breast cancer above that associated with estrogen alone and in non-hysterectomized women estrogen substitution alone increases the risk of uterine cancer, which triggered renewed interest in long-cycle HRT regimens (estrogen replacement therapy with progesterone-free intervals up to 6 months). The effects on bone of such long-cycle HRT regimens are unknown. The objective of the present study was to compare the effects on bone and the endometrium of long-cycle HRT and conventional HRT. METHODS: Seventy-three healthy non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women were randomized to either conventional HRT (estradiol (E2) 2 mg/d during 12 days, E2 2 mg/d plus 1 mg/d of norethisterone acetate (NETA) during 10 days, E2 1 mg/d for 6 days) or long-cycle HRT treatment (two cycles with E2 2 mg/d during 28 days, followed by one cycle of conventional HRT and repeated every 3 months). Primary endpoint was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) over 24 months. RESULTS: BMD at LS increased significantly versus baseline in both treatment groups (conventional HRT +3.8 +/- 0.6%, long-cycle HRT +3.3 +/- 0.5%, p < 0.0001 for both) with no significant difference between treatment groups over 24 months. Similar significant BMD increases versus baseline were observed at the femoral neck, while biochemical markers of bone turnover (osteocalcin and deoxypyridinoline) were significantly decreased over 24 months. There were no endometrial or breast related adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: Long-cycle HRT may be a valid alternative to conventional HRT with regard to protection against postmenopausal bone loss.

Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss using tibolone or conventional peroral or transdermal hormone replacement therapy with 17beta-estradiol and dydrogesterone

Postmenopausal bone loss can be prevented by continuous or intermittent estradiol (E2) administration. Concomitant progestogen therapy is mandatory in nonhysterectomized women to curtail the risk of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer. However, the recurrence of vaginal bleeding induced by sequential progestogen therapy in addition to continuous estrogen administration is one of the reasons for noncompliance to hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Tibolone, a synthetic steroid with simultaneous weak estrogenic, androgenic, and progestational activity, which does not stimulate endometrial proliferation, has recently been proposed for the treatment of climacteric symptoms. To compare the efficacy of conventional oral and transdermal HRT with that of tibolone in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, 140 postmenopausal women (age, 52 +/- 0.6 years; median duration of menopause, 3 years) were enrolled in an open 2-year study. Volunteers had been offered a choice between HRT and no therapy (control group, CO). Patients selecting HRT were randomly allocated to one of the following three treatment groups: TIB, tibolone, 2.5 mg/day continuously, orally; PO, peroral E2, 2 mg/day continuously, plus sequential oral dydrogesterone (DYD), 10 mg/day, for 14 days of a 28-day cycle; TTS, transdermal E2 by patch releasing 50 microg/day, plus DYD as above. Bone densitometry of the lumbar spine, upper femur, and whole body was performed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline, and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after initiation of therapy. One hundred and fifteen women (82%) completed the 2 years of the study. The dropout rate was similar in each group. Over 2 years, bone preservation was observed in all three treatment groups as compared with controls, without significant differences among treatment regimens. In conclusion, tibolone can be regarded as an alternative to conventional HRT to prevent postmenopausal bone loss.