1 resultado para methodology for training
em BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (6)
- Repository Napier (3)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (3)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (9)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (55)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (32)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (45)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (150)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (14)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (19)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (10)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (11)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (66)
- Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, Brazil - Carpe dIEN (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (435)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (12)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
Resumo:
Mainstreaming the LforS approach is a challenge due to dive rging institutional priorities, customs, and expectations of classically traine d staff. A workshop to test LforS theory and practice, and explore how to mainstream it, took place in a concrete context in a rural district of Mozambique, focusing on agricultural, forest and water resources. The evaluation showed that the principles of interaction applied pe rmitted to link rational know ledge with practical experience through mutual learning and iterative self-reflection. The combination of learning techniques was considered usef ul; participants called for further opportunities to apply the LforS methodology, proposing next steps.