2 resultados para localized detection
em BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça
Resumo:
We report on a 43-year old patient with an acute T-Cell Leucemia, currently in Aplasia after Chemotherapy, showing five targetoid bluish skin lesions. Due to a three weeks history of septic symptoms he was under treatment with antibiotics and antifungals. Multiple septic foci were localized (N. caudatus, liver, kidneys, lung, spine and right psoas). Microbiology analyses of various blood cultures and of the aspirate of the psoas abscess showed initially negative results. Clinically the skin lesions were suspected to be of septic or thrombogenic origin. A 5 mm punch biopsy was performed and separated for microbiological diagnostic and conventional histology. Surprisingly large fungal agents in mostly intravascular distribution were seen histologically and identified as Lichtheimia corymbifera (syn. Absidia corymbifera) by PCR. Cultures remained negative. The patient died on the following day. Lichtheimia corymbifera is a fungus belonging to the family of mucormycosis. Aspergillosis and mucormycosis are the most common mold infections in patients with hematological malignancies, clinically often indistinguishable. However, the true incidence of mucormycosis is not known and probably underestimated because of difficulties in diagnosis. Mucormycosis typically causes acute, aggressive, and frequently angioinvasive infections presenting with solitary local skin necrosis. The fact that the pathogenic fungus was isolated from a very discrete skin lesion but was not detected in blood cultures, and only later in the PCR of the aspirate of the psoas abscess, makes this case exceptional.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVES The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the effect of different levels of magnification on the accuracy and reliability of visual caries detection using ICDAS criteria. METHODS Occlusal surfaces of 100 extracted molars were assessed by 14 examiners (3rd and the 4th year dental students and dentists) using no magnification aids, a 2.5× Galilean loupe, a 4.5× Keplerian loupe, or a surgical microscope with 10× magnification. The assessments were repeated on a different day. Sensitivity, specificity, AUC and reliabilities were calculated according to the gold standard of histology. RESULTS We found that with increasing magnification, the number of surfaces rated as "sound" (ICDAS code 0) decreased, while the number of surfaces with a localized enamel breakdown (ICDAS code 3) increased. While the sensitivities increased, the values of the specificities decreased to an unacceptably low level irrespective of the clinical experience of the examiners. CONCLUSIONS ICDAS seems to be optimized for natural vision up to 2.0× magnification and not for high magnifications. The use of powerful magnification in visual caries detection involves the risk of unnecessary and premature invasive treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This paper discusses when it does and does not make sense to use magnification devices for visual caries detection using ICDAS criteria. Strong magnifications should be refrained from for this purpose.