Nuclear receptor and nuclear receptor target gene messenger ribonucleic acid levels at different sites of the gastrointestinal tract and in liver of healthy dogs

Nuclear receptors (NR) are ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate different metabolic pathways by influencing the expression of target genes. The current study examined mRNA abundance of NR and NR target genes at different sites of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and the liver of healthy dogs (Beagles; n = 11). Samples of GIT and liver were collected postmortem and homogenized, total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed, and gene expression was quantified by real-time reverse-transcription PCR relative to the mean of 3 housekeeping genes (beta-actin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and ubi-quitin). Differences were observed (P < or = 0.05) in the mRNA abundance among stomach (St), duodenum (Du), jejunum (Je), ileum (Il), and colon (Col) for NR [pregnane X receptor (Du, Je > Il, Col > St), peroxisome proliferator-associated receptor gamma (St, Du, Col > Je, Il), constitutive androstane receptor (Je, Du > Il, Col), and retinoid x receptor alpha (Du > Il)] and NR target genes [glutathione-S-transferase A3-3 (Du > Je > St, Il; St > Col), phenol-sulfating phenol sulfotransferase 1A1 (Du, Je > Il, St; Col > St), cytochrome P450 3A12 (Du, Je > St, Il, Col), multiple drug resistance gene 1 (Du, Je, Il, Col > St), multiple drug resistance-associated protein 2 (Je, Du > Il > St, Col), multiple drug resistance-associated protein 3 (Col > St > Il; Du > Je, Il; St > Il), NR corepressor 2 (St > Il, Col), and cytochrome P450 reductase (St, Du, Je > Il, Col)], but not for peroxisome proliferator-associated receptor alpha. Differences (P > 0.05) in mRNA abundance in the liver relative to the GIT were also observed. In conclusion, the presence of numerous differences in expression of NR and NR target genes in different parts of the GIT and in liver of healthy dogs may be associated with location-specific functions and regulation of GIT regions.

Medicinal plants - prophylactic and therapeutic options for gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in calves and piglets? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in calves and piglets lead to significant economic losses in livestock husbandry. A high morbidity has been reported for diarrhea (calves ≤ 35 %; piglets ≤ 50 %) and for respiratory diseases (calves ≤ 80 %; piglets ≤ 40 %). Despite a highly diverse etiology and pathophysiology of these diseases, treatment with antimicrobials is often the first-line therapy. Multi-antimicrobial resistance in pathogens results in international accordance to strengthen the research in novel treatment options. Medicinal plants bear a potential as alternative or additional treatment. Based on the versatile effects of their plant specific multi-component-compositions, medicinal plants can potentially act as 'multi-target drugs'. Regarding the plurality of medicinal plants, the aim of this systematic review was to identify potential medicinal plant species for prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases and for modulation of the immune system and inflammation in calves and piglets. RESULTS Based on nine initial sources including standard textbooks and European ethnoveterinary studies, a total of 223 medicinal plant species related to the treatment of gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases was identified. A defined search strategy was established using the PRISMA statement to evaluate 30 medicinal plant species starting from 20'000 peer-reviewed articles published in the last 20 years (1994-2014). This strategy led to 418 references (257 in vitro, 84 in vivo and 77 clinical trials, thereof 48 clinical trials in veterinary medicine) to evaluate effects of medicinal plants and their efficacy in detail. The findings indicate that the most promising candidates for gastrointestinal diseases are Allium sativum L., Mentha x piperita L. and Salvia officinalis L.; for diseases of the respiratory tract Echinacea purpurea (L.) MOENCH, Thymus vulgaris L. and Althea officinalis L. were found most promising, and Echinacea purpurea (L.) MOENCH, Camellia sinensis (L.) KUNTZE, Glycyrrhiza glabra L. and Origanum vulgare L. were identified as best candidates for modulation of the immune system and inflammation. CONCLUSIONS Several medicinal plants bear a potential for novel treatment strategies for young livestock. There is a need for further research focused on gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in calves and piglets, and the findings of this review provide a basis on plant selection for future studies.