Full-text publication of abstracts presented at European Orthodontic Society congresses.

INTRODUCTION Empirical evidence has indicated that only a subsample of studies conducted reach full-text publication and this phenomenon has become known as publication bias. A form of publication bias is the selectively delayed full publication of conference abstracts. The objective of this article was to examine the publication status of oral abstracts and poster-presentation abstracts, included in the scientific program of the 82nd and 83rd European Orthodontic Society (EOS) congresses, held in 2006 and 2007, and to identify factors associated with full-length publication. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases was performed in April 2013 using author names and keywords from the abstract title to locate abstract and full-article publications. Information regarding mode of presentation, type of affiliation, geographical origin, statistical results, and publication details were collected and analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Approximately 51 per cent of the EOS 2006 and 55 per cent of the EOS 2007 abstracts appeared in print more than 5 years post congress. A mean period of 1.32 years elapsed between conference and publication date. Mode of presentation (oral or poster), use of statistical analysis, and research subject area were significant predictors for publication success. LIMITATIONS Inherent discrepancies of abstract reporting, mainly related to presentation of preliminary results and incomplete description of methods, may be considered in analogous studies. CONCLUSIONS On average 52.2 per cent of the abstracts presented at the two EOS conferences reached full publication. Abstracts presented orally, including statistical analysis, were more likely to get published.

The role of intercostal nerve preservation in pain control after thoracotomy

OBJECTIVES Pain control after thoracotomy is an important issue that affects the outcome in thoracic surgery. Intercostal nerve preservation (ICNP) has increased interest in the outcomes of conventional thoracotomy. The current study critically evaluates the role of preservation of the intercostal nerve in early and late pain control and its benefit in patients undergoing thoracotomy. METHODS Data obtained prospectively between January 2006 and December 2010 by a study colleague at our division of General Thoracic Surgery were retrospectively analysed. There were 491 patients who underwent thoracotomy. Eighty-one patients were excluded from the study due to incompatible data. Patients were divided into two groups according to the intercostal nerve state: Group I consisted of patients with ICNP and Group II consisted of patients with intercostal nerve sacrifice. RESULTS Group I consisted of 288 patients [206 male (71%), P < 0.001, mean age 66 years]. Group II consisted of 122 patients [79 male (64%), P = 0.001, mean age 66 years]. There was less use of opiate in Group I (P = 0.019). Early mobilization of the patients was significantly higher in Group I (P = 0.031). The rate of pneumonia and re-admission to the intensive care unit was higher in Group II (P = 0.017 and 0.023, respectively). The rate of pain-free patients at discharge was significantly higher in Group I (P = 0.028). A 2-week follow-up after hospital discharge showed parasternal hypoesthesia to be more in Group II (P = 0.034). Significant patient contentment in Group I was noticed (P = 0.014). Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP) was higher in Group II (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS ICNP without harvesting an intercostal muscle flap achieves excellent outcomes in controlling acute post-thoracotomy pain and CPTP. ICNP is an effective, simple method to perform, and it should be considered as standard in performing thoracotomy.