The role of intercostal nerve preservation in pain control after thoracotomy

OBJECTIVES Pain control after thoracotomy is an important issue that affects the outcome in thoracic surgery. Intercostal nerve preservation (ICNP) has increased interest in the outcomes of conventional thoracotomy. The current study critically evaluates the role of preservation of the intercostal nerve in early and late pain control and its benefit in patients undergoing thoracotomy. METHODS Data obtained prospectively between January 2006 and December 2010 by a study colleague at our division of General Thoracic Surgery were retrospectively analysed. There were 491 patients who underwent thoracotomy. Eighty-one patients were excluded from the study due to incompatible data. Patients were divided into two groups according to the intercostal nerve state: Group I consisted of patients with ICNP and Group II consisted of patients with intercostal nerve sacrifice. RESULTS Group I consisted of 288 patients [206 male (71%), P < 0.001, mean age 66 years]. Group II consisted of 122 patients [79 male (64%), P = 0.001, mean age 66 years]. There was less use of opiate in Group I (P = 0.019). Early mobilization of the patients was significantly higher in Group I (P = 0.031). The rate of pneumonia and re-admission to the intensive care unit was higher in Group II (P = 0.017 and 0.023, respectively). The rate of pain-free patients at discharge was significantly higher in Group I (P = 0.028). A 2-week follow-up after hospital discharge showed parasternal hypoesthesia to be more in Group II (P = 0.034). Significant patient contentment in Group I was noticed (P = 0.014). Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP) was higher in Group II (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS ICNP without harvesting an intercostal muscle flap achieves excellent outcomes in controlling acute post-thoracotomy pain and CPTP. ICNP is an effective, simple method to perform, and it should be considered as standard in performing thoracotomy.

Total disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical interbody fusion: use of the Spine Tango registry to supplement the evidence from randomized control trials.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared patient outcomes of anterior (cervical) interbody fusion (AIF) with those of total disc arthroplasty (TDA). Because RCTs have known limitations with regard to their external validity, the comparative effectiveness of the two therapies in daily practice remains unknown. PURPOSE This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes after TDA versus AIF based on data from an international spine registry. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A retrospective analysis of registry data was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE Inclusion criteria were degenerative disc or disc herniation of the cervical spine treated by single-level TDA or AIF, no previous surgery, and a Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) completed at baseline and at least 3 months' follow-up. Overall, 987 patients were identified. OUTCOME MEASURES Neck and arm pain relief and COMI score improvement were the outcome measures. METHODS Three separate analyses were performed to compare TDA and AIF surgical outcomes: (1) mimicking an RCT setting, with admission criteria typical of those in published RCTs, a 1:1 matched analysis was carried out in 739 patients; (2) an analysis was performed on 248 patients outside the classic RCT spectrum, that is, with one or more typical RCT exclusion criteria; (3) a subgroup analysis of all patients with additional follow-up longer than 2 years (n=149). RESULTS Matching resulted in 190 pairs with an average follow-up of 17 months that had no residual significant differences for any patient characteristics. Small but statistically significant differences in outcome were observed in favor of TDA, which are potentially clinically relevant. Subgroup analyses of atypical patients and of patients with longer-term follow-up showed no significant differences in outcome between the treatments. CONCLUSIONS The results of this observational study were in accordance with those of the published RCTs, suggesting substantial pain reduction both after AIF and TDA, with slightly greater benefit after arthroplasty. The analysis of atypical patients suggested that, in patients outside the spectrum of clinical trials, both surgical interventions appeared to work to a similar extent to that shown for the cohort in the matched study. Also, in the longer-term perspective, both therapies resulted in similar benefits to the patients.