Maize Domestication and Anti-Herbivore Defences: Leaf-Specific Dynamics during Early Ontogeny of Maize and Its Wild Ancestors

As a consequence of artificial selection for specific traits, crop plants underwent considerable genotypic and phenotypic changes during the process of domestication. These changes may have led to reduced resistance in the cultivated plant due to shifts in resource allocation from defensive traits to increased growth rates and yield. Modern maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) was domesticated from its ancestor Balsas teosinte (Z. mays ssp. parviglumis) approximately 9000 years ago. Although maize displays a high genetic overlap with its direct ancestor and other annual teosintes, several studies show that maize and its ancestors differ in their resistance phenotypes with teosintes being less susceptible to herbivore damage. However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we addressed the question to what extent maize domestication has affected two crucial chemical and one physical defence traits and whether differences in their expression may explain the differences in herbivore resistance levels. The ontogenetic trajectories of 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones, maysin and leaf toughness were monitored for different leaf types across several maize cultivars and teosinte accessions during early vegetative growth stages. We found significant quantitative and qualitative differences in 1,4-benzoxazin-3-one accumulation in an initial pairwise comparison, but we did not find consistent differences between wild and cultivated genotypes during a more thorough examination employing several cultivars/accessions. Yet, 1,4-benzoxazin-3-one levels tended to decline more rapidly with plant age in the modern maize cultivars. Foliar maysin levels and leaf toughness increased with plant age in a leaf-specific manner, but were also unaffected by domestication. Based on our findings we suggest that defence traits other than the ones that were investigated are responsible for the observed differences in herbivore resistance between teosinte and maize. Furthermore, our results indicate that single pairwise comparisons may lead to false conclusions regarding the effects of domestication on defensive and possibly other traits.

Holographic renormalization for z = 2 Lifshitz spacetimes from AdS

Lifshitz spacetimes with the critical exponent z = 2 can be obtained by the dimensional reduction of Schrödinger spacetimes with the critical exponent z = 0. The latter spacetimes are asymptotically AdS solutions of AdS gravity coupled to an axion–dilaton system and can be uplifted to solutions of type IIB supergravity. This basic observation is used to perform holographic renormalization for four-dimensional asymptotically z = 2 locally Lifshitz spacetimes by the Scherk–Schwarz dimensional reduction of the corresponding problem of holographic renormalization for five-dimensional asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes coupled to an axion–dilaton system. We can thus define and characterize a four-dimensional asymptotically locally z = 2 Lifshitz spacetime in terms of five-dimensional AdS boundary data. In this setup the four-dimensional structure of the Fefferman–Graham expansion and the structure of the counterterm action, including the scale anomaly, will be discussed. We find that for asymptotically locally z = 2 Lifshitz spacetimes obtained in this way, there are two anomalies each with their own associated nonzero central charge. Both anomalies follow from the Scherk–Schwarz dimensional reduction of the five-dimensional conformal anomaly of AdS gravity coupled to an axion–dilaton system. Together, they make up an action that is of the Horava–Lifshitz type with a nonzero potential term for z = 2 conformal gravity.