The role of FUS in splicing regulation

Fused in sarcoma (FUS), also called translocated in liposarcoma (TLS), is a ubiquitously expressed DNA/RNA binding protein belonging to the TET family and predominantly localized in the nucleus. FUS is proposed to be involved in various RNA metabolic pathways including transcription regulation, nucleo-cytosolic RNA transport, microRNA processing or pre-mRNA splicing [1]. Mutations in the FUS gene were identified in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) type 6 and sporadic ALS [2, 3]. ALS, also termed Lou Gehrig's disease, is a fatal adult-onset neurodegenerative disease affecting upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. There is increasing evidence supporting the hypothesis that FUS might play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing regulation. Several splicing factors were identified to associate with FUS including hnRNPA2 and C1/C2 [4], Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) [5] and serine arginine (SR) proteins (SC35 and TASR) [6]. Additionally, FUS was identified as a constituent of human spliceosomal complexes [1]. Our recent results indicate that FUS has increased affinity for certain but not all snRNPs of the minor and major spliceosome. Furthermore, in vitro studies revealed that FUS directly interacts with a factor specific for one of those snRNPs. These findings might uncover the molecular mechanism by which FUS regulates splicing and could explain previously observed effects of FUS on the splicing of the adenovirus E1A minigene [7] and changes in splicing caused by ALS associated FUS mutations. [1] Lagier-Tourenne C et al. (2010) Human Molecular Genetics 19:46-64 [2] Kwiatkowski TJ Jr et al. (2009) Science 323:1205-8 [3] Vance C et al. (2009) Science 323:1208-11 [4] Zinser H et al. (1994) Genes Dev 8:2513-26 [5] Chansky, H.A., et al. (2001) Cancer Res. 61: 3586-90. [6] Yang L et al. (1998) J Biol Chem 273:27761-6 [7] Kino Y et al. (2010) Nucleic Acid Research 7:2781-2798

The FUS(s) about splicing

Fused in sarcoma (FUS), also called translocated in liposarcoma (TLS), is a ubiquitously expressed DNA/RNA binding protein belonging to the TET family and predominantly localized in the nucleus. FUS is proposed to be involved in various RNA metabolic pathways including transcription regulation, nucleo-cytosolic RNA transport, microRNA processing or pre-mRNA splicing [1]. Mutations in the FUS gene were identified in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) type 6 and sporadic ALS [2, 3]. ALS, also termed Lou Gehrig's disease, is a fatal adult-onset neurodegenerative disease affecting upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. There is increasing evidence supporting the hypothesis that FUS might play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing regulation. Several splicing factors were identified to associate with FUS including hnRNPA2 and C1/C2 [4], Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) [5] and serine arginine (SR) proteins (SC35 and TASR) [6]. Additionally, FUS was identified as a constituent of human spliceosomal complexes [1]. Our recent results indicate that FUS has increased affinity for certain but not all snRNPs of the minor and major spliceosome. Furthermore, in vitro studies revealed that FUS directly interacts with a factor specific for one of those snRNPs. These findings might uncover the molecular mechanism by which FUS regulates splicing and could explain previously observed effects of FUS on the splicing of the adenovirus E1A minigene [7] and changes in splicing caused by ALS associated FUS mutations. [1] Lagier-Tourenne C et al. (2010) Human Molecular Genetics 19:46-64 [2] Kwiatkowski TJ Jr et al. (2009) Science 323:1205-8 [3] Vance C et al. (2009) Science 323:1208-11 [4] Zinser H et al. (1994) Genes Dev 8:2513-26 [5] Chansky, H.A., et al. (2001) Cancer Res. 61: 3586-90. [6] Yang L et al. (1998) J Biol Chem 273:27761-6 [7] Kino Y et al. (2010) Nucleic Acid Research 7:2781-2798

Extrapolated difference technique for the determination of atomization energies of Sm, Eu, and Yb bromides

An approach for the determination of atomization energies based on the extrapolated difference technique in the framework of Knudsen effusion mass spectrometry is proposed. Its essence is the use of thermodynamic data for the determination of the appearance energy of fragment ions of a reference and a special mathematical treatment of the ionization efficiency functions. The advantages of this approach are demonstrated for the cases of incongruently vaporizing lanthanide bromides that suffer from decomposition or disproportionation at high temperatures. The atomization energies for SmBr2 (7.78±0.12 eV), EuBr2 (7.51±0.11 eV), YbBr2 (7.25±0.13 eV), SmBr3 (11.09±0.10 eV), and YbBr3 (10.23±0.09 eV) molecules have been determined for the first time.

Atomization Energies of LnX Molecules (Ln = Sm, Eu, and Yb; X = Cl, Br, and I)

The gas phase equilibria Ba + LnX = BaX + Ln (Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb; X = Cl, Br, I) were investigated by Knudsen effusion mass spectrometry using a low energy of ionizing electrons to avoid fragmentation processes. The BaX molecules were used as references with well-established bond energies. The atomization enthalpies ΔatH0° of the LnX molecules were determined to be 427 ± 9 (SmCl), 409 ± 9 (EuCl), 366 ± 9 (YbCl), 360 ± 10 (SmBr), 356 ± 13 (EuBr), 316 ± 9 (YbBr), 317 ± 10 (SmI), 293 ± 10 (EuI), and 283 ± 10 (YbI) kJ·mol−1.

Simulating Energy Transfer and Upconversion in β-NaYF 4 : Yb 3+ , Tm 3+

The design of upconversion phosphors with higher quantum yield requires a deeper understanding of the detailed energy transfer and upconversion processes between active ions inside the material. Rate equations can model those processes by describing the populations of the energy levels of the ions as a function of time. However, this model presents some drawbacks: energy migration is assumed to be infinitely fast, it does not determine the detailed interaction mechanism (multipolar or exchange), and it only provides the macroscopic averaged parameters of interaction. Hence, a rate equation model with the same parameters cannot correctly predict the time evolution of upconverted emission and power dependence under a wide range of concentrations of active ions. We present a model that combines information about the host material lattice, the concentration of active ions, and a microscopic rate equation system. The extent of energy migration is correctly taken into account because the energy transfer processes are described on the level of the individual ions. This model predicts the decay curves, concentration, and excitation power dependences of the emission. This detailed information can be used to predict the optimal concentration that results in the maximum upconverted emission.

Vapor phase composition as an indicator of thermal stability of the Sm, Eu, and Yb chlorides

The Sm, Eu, and Yb tri- and dichlorides were investigated by Knudsen effusion mass spectrometry. It was found out by the analysis of mass spectra and ionization efficiency curves that the vapor composition is complex due to the partial high temperature decomposition/disproportionation of the samples. Up to five vapor species were identified for both LnCl3 (LnCl3, LnCl2, Ln2Cl4, Ln2Cl5, and Ln2Cl6) and LnCl2 (LnCl3, LnCl2, LnCl, Ln, and Ln2Cl4). The quantitative evaluation of vapor composition was made. It indicates that the disproportionation of SmCl2 and EuCl2 is negligible in the temperature range studied whereas that of YbCl2 and the decomposition of SmCl3 and YbCl3 cannot be neglected.