Therapeutic efficacy of teicoplanin in experimental enterococcal endocarditis

The antimicrobial activities of teicoplanin and ampicillin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, were compared in experimental Streptococcus faecalis endocarditis. Bacterial titers in vegetations of rabbits treated with teicoplanin were significantly lower than those of untreated controls (P less than 0.01) and were equivalent to titers in ampicillin-treated animals. Gentamicin increased the activities of both drugs to a comparable degree.

Restricted use of glycopeptides in paediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia

Until now, studies confirming the safety of glycopeptide restriction in the empirical treatment of prolonged fever and neutropenia included only nine children. In an open-label observational study, the use of teicoplanin in paediatric oncology patients was investigated. A period of unrestricted use (2001-2003) was compared with a second period (2004) following implementation of a restrictive treatment guideline. Empirical first-line treatment consisted of piperacillin/tazobactam; in 2004, fosfomycin was added after 72 h as the second-line combination instead of teicoplanin. In total, 213 episodes (n=163 in 2001-2003; n=50 in 2004) managed with teicoplanin or fosfomycin (only 2004) were eligible. Empirical treatment of fever of unknown origin with teicoplanin was reduced by 97%. In 2004, the mean length of stay was 0.4 days shorter, no infection-related death occurred and no vancomycin-resistant enterococci were detected. Restriction of empirical glycopeptides is safe in paediatric cancer patients after first-line treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam. Fosfomycin appears to offer a feasible and cost-saving alternative in second-line combination therapy.