Wahrnehmung und Interpretation von Unterrichtsstörungen aus Schülerperspektive sowie aus Sicht der Lehrpersonen.

The contribution is based on an understanding of teaching as an interaction system that encompasses all parties in the classroom. Social order in classrooms is established through mutual awareness, which includes the perception of classroom disruptions. Using qualitative data, this paper examines the extent to which students’ and teachers’ perspectives coincide with respect to both the perception of classroom disruptions and the teachers’ reaction to discipline disruptions. For this purpose, classrooms were categorized into either infrequent-disruption or frequent-disruption classrooms. The results show, firstly, a high correspondence between teachers’ and students’ perception of classroom disruptions; secondly, a self-serving bias in the teachers’ perception of their own reactions on discipline disruptions; and thirdly, a different interpretation of the term discipline disruption in infrequent- and frequent-disruption classrooms. The possibility that teachers themselves might cause classroom disruptions is discussed. In addition, the concept of classroom management is put into perspective.

General practitioner teachers’ job satisfaction and their medical students' wish to join the field – a correlational study

Background There will be increasing competition for young physicians worldwide as more and more physicians retire. While enthusiasm towards GP work is important for GP teachers as role models, satisfaction within the profession has declined. This study aims to determine if medical students’ desire to become GPs is related to the job satisfaction of their teaching GPs and explore the factors tied to this job satisfaction. Methods In this cross-sectional, correlational study, teaching GPs of the University of Bern and the fourth year medical students completing internships with them filled in separate questionnaires. Results Whether or not the GP teacher is perceived by a student to be satisfied with her/his job is correlated to that student’s satisfaction with the internship, which in turn, is correlated with student’s wish to be a GP after the internship. Results show which factors are most related to GP job satisfaction and the effect of working hours and their composition. Conclusions Medical students’ perception of their GP teachers’ job satisfaction positively affect their wish to become GPs, and their satisfaction with their internships adds to this. Enhancing the positive aspects of GP work, such as recognition, and improving negative ones, such as administrative duties, are necessary to attract medical students into the GP field.

Does gender-fair language pay off? The social perception of professions from a cross-linguistic perspective

In many languages, masculine forms (e.g., German Lehrer, “teachers, masc.”) have traditionally been used to refer to both women and men, although feminine forms are available, too. Feminine-masculine word pairs (e.g., German Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, “teachers, fem. and teachers, masc.”) are recommended as gender-fair alternatives. A large body of empirical research documents that the use of gender-fair forms instead of masculine forms has a substantial impact on mental representations. Masculine forms activate more male representations even when used in a generic sense, whereas word pairs (e.g., German Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, “teachers, fem. and teachers, masc.”) lead to a higher cognitive inclusion of women (i.e., visibility of women). Some recent studies, however, have also shown that in a professional context word pairs may be associated with lesser status. The present research is the first to investigate both effects within a single paradigm. A cross-linguistic (Italian and German) study with 391 participants shows that word pairs help to avoid a male bias in the gender-typing of professions and increase women's visibility; at the same time, they decrease the estimated salaries of typically feminine professions (but do not affect perceived social status or competence). This potential payoff has implications for language policies aiming at gender-fairness.