Personalized X-Ray Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur via Intensity-Based Non-rigid 2D-3D Registration

This paper presents a new approach for reconstructing a patient-specific shape model and internal relative intensity distribution of the proximal femur from a limited number (e.g., 2) of calibrated C-arm images or X-ray radiographs. Our approach uses independent shape and appearance models that are learned from a set of training data to encode the a priori information about the proximal femur. An intensity-based non-rigid 2D-3D registration algorithm is then proposed to deformably fit the learned models to the input images. The fitting is conducted iteratively by minimizing the dissimilarity between the input images and the associated digitally reconstructed radiographs of the learned models together with regularization terms encoding the strain energy of the forward deformation and the smoothness of the inverse deformation. Comprehensive experiments conducted on images of cadaveric femurs and on clinical datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the present approach.

Moments of tension and strain in psychotherapy and how they promote a good alliance and outcome

It is well established that the therapeutic relationship contributes about as much to therapy outcome as ‘technical’ intervention. Furthermore, it follows clear prescriptive concepts in the same manner as technical interventions do. ‘Motive Oriented Therapeutic Relationship’ is such a concept for establishing a solid basis for whatever therapeutic work the patients’ problems require (Grawe, 1980, 1992; Caspar, 1996). Yet, the therapeutic relationship doesn’t explain everything because other factors play a significant role too. Previous studies showed that outcome is clearly better when therapists achieved a generally high quality of a therapeutic relationship when they did not shy away from possibly threatening interventions such as confrontations. This ratio of a fruitful alliance and marginally present confrontations in the same session also showed significant correlations with patient’s assessment of alliance and progress in therapy (Figlioli et al., 2009). The current state of research in the field, however, does not give any answers to questions like how good and bad confrontations can be characterized or what role does the intensity, respectively frequency of confrontations play in the process of psychotherapy. Therefore, we analyzed a sample of 80 therapies of 3 sessions each representing either good or bad outcome. Independent raters judged moment by moment how therapists used confrontative interventions. 20 cases, which showed an excellent or a very poor outcome, as well as an unexpected pattern were analyzed in further quantitative details. We found that confrontations are correlated to good outcome when they are uttered implicitly, related to an important topic of the patient (e.g. one of the defined therapy goals), long but weak, embedded in prior complementarity and not in the first three sessions of a therapy, as well as not an interactional discrepancy between the patient and the therapist.