Kinneret – eine nichtbiblische Stadt im Land der Bibel

Schon lange schlägt die Region um den See Gennesaret die Menschen in ihren Bann. Zahlreiche Touristen und Pilger besuchen die Region in jedem Jahr, und seit Beginn der wissenschaftlichen Erforschung Palästinas haben unterschiedliche Expeditionen viele neue Erkenntnisse über die Kultur und Geschichte dieses für Judentum wie Christentum so bedeutsamen Landstrichs erbracht. Der Vortrag beleuchtet die Vorgeschichte dieser bedeutenden Kulturlandschaft am Beispiel der antiken Stadt Kinneret, die in ägyptischen Quellen mehrfach, in der Bibel jedoch nur einmal (Josua 19:35) erwähnt wird. Die Ortslage wurde von 2003 bis 2008 im Rahmen des internationalen «Kinneret Regional Project» unter leitender Beteiligung der Universität Bern in einer ersten Phase untersucht. Die Publikation der Zwischenergebnisse ist derzeit in Vorbereitung. Der Ruinenhügel von Kinneret (hebr. Tel Kinrot, arab. Tell el-‘Orēme) liegt am Nordwestufer des Sees Gennesaret. Die Fundstätte weist eine – freilich nicht kontinuierliche – Besiedlung von der Jungsteinzeit bis in die osmanische Zeit auf. Im Fokus der Berner Forschung lag bisher vor allem die Untersuchung der Siedlungsschichten der Frühen Eisenzeit (ca. 1100 bis 950 v.u.Z.). Während dieser Epoche dominierte die Stadt Kinneret die Region um den See. Der Ort verfügte damals – im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen, zeitgenössischen Siedlungen in der Grossregion – über eine imposante Wehranlage, zentral geplante Straßenzüge und eine eindrückliche Wohnbebauung, die mehreren Tausend Einwohnern Platz bot. Zahlreiche Funde belegen intensive, transregionale Handels- und Kulturkontakte, die von Ägypten über Philistäa, Phönizien und Zypern bis nach Nordsyrien reichten. Aufgrund des ungewöhnlich guten Erhaltungszustandes der überaus reichen materiellen Kultur ermöglicht die Untersuchung des antiken Kinneret einen einzigartigen Einblick in die sozio-kulturellen Strukturen eines urbanen Zentrums zur Zeit der ersten Könige Israels und Judas am Anfang des 1. Jahrtausends v.u.Z. Informationen zum «Kinneret Regional Project» finden Sie unter: www.kinneret-excavations.org

Anmerkungen zu den (spät)persischen Samaria-Bullen aus dem Wadi ed-Dalije. Hellenisches, Persisches und Lokaltraditionen im Grenzgebiet der Provinz Jehud

The present article deals exemplarily with the remarkable iconographic attestations connected with the Wadi ed-Daliye (WD) findings. The discussed bullae were attached to papyri which provide a clear dating of the hoard between 375-335 BCE. Considering style and convention the preserved motives are to be classified as Persian, Greek or Greco-Persian. A major goal of the following presentation is the contextualization of the very material; this is achieved by taking into account local parallels as well as relevant attestations of the dominant / “imperial” cultures of Persia and Greece. The correlation of motives with the (often more complex, more detailed or more contoured) examples stemming from the “source-cultures” follows a clear agenda: It is methodologically based on the approach that was employed by Silvia Schroer and Othmar Keel throughout the project „Die Ikonographie Palästinas/Israels und der Alte Orient (IPIAO). Eine Religionsgeschichte in Bildern” (2005, 23ff). The WD-findings demand a careful analysis since the influencing cultures behind the imagery are deeply rooted in the field of Greek mythology and iconography. Special attention has to be drawn to the bullae, as far as excavated, from a huge Punic temple archive of Carthago (Berges 1997 and 2002) as well as those from the archive of the satrap seat in Daskyleion in the Northwest of Asia Minor (Kaptan 2002), which are chronologically close (end 5th and 4th century BCE) to the WD-finds. Not each and every single motive and artifact of the WD-corpus comprising more than 120 items can be dealt with in detail throughout the following pages. We refer to the editio princeps by Leith (1990, 1997) respectively to the concerning chapter in Keel’s Corpus volume II (Keel 2010, 340-379). The article gives a brief history of research (2.), some basic remarks on the development of style (3.) and a selection of detail-studies (4.). A crosscheck with other relevant corpora of stamp-seals (5.) as well as a compressed synthesis (6.) are contributions in order to characterize and classify the unique iconographic assemblage. There are rather few references to the late Persian coins from Samaria (Meshorer/Qedar 1999), which have been impressed about contemporaneous with the WD-bullae (372-333 BCE), as there is an article by Patrick Wyssmann in this volume about that specific corpus. Through the perspective of the late Persian iconography, Samaria appears as a dazzling metropolis at the crossroads of Greek and Persian culture, which is far away from a strict and revolutionary religious orthodoxy

Tel Aviv - Mumbai - Tel Aviv: Same-Sex couples seeking parenthood in India

In Israel religious belonging remains a central category of citizenship. Laws concerning reproductive technologies such as the surrogacy law from 1996 are strongly informed by Orthodox rabbis’ kinship concepts (Kahn 2000, Shalev 1998, Weisberg 2005). A set of regulations secures that heterosexual Jewish couples bring into being children who are unequivocally Jewish themselves. The Israeli surrogacy law can therefore be understood as part of a policy seeking to reproduce the boundaries of the Jewish-Israeli collective. Same-sex couples do not fit this narrow definition of family and have no access to surrogacy in Israel. Yet gay couples maintain that parenthood is a universal civil right and bypass their exclusion through surrogacy arrangements abroad. The proposed paper follows these couples to Mumbai, which has become a popular destination for surrogacy in recent years. After their children’s birth the couples spend three to five weeks in India. In this time they not only take on their new tasks as fathers. They are also occupied with the bureaucracy of disconnecting the children from India and turning them into Israeli citizens. The paper elaborates on the bureaucratic processes and the hurdles same-sex couples encounter when seeking recognition of their parenthood and citizenship for their children. It unveils the intricacies and ramifications of Israel’s contradicting surrogacy policy of enforcing narrow definitions of family inside the country and simultaneously outsourcing problematic cases.