REGULATION OF WHOLE-BODY ENERGY HOMEOSTASIS WITH GROWTH HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY AND ENDURANCE EXERCISE

We hypothesized that network analysis is useful to expose coordination between whole body and myocellular levels of energy metabolism and can identify entities that underlie skeletal muscle's contribution to growth hormone-stimulated lipid handling and metabolic fitness. We assessed 112 metabolic parameters characterizing metabolic rate and substrate handling in tibialis anterior muscle and vascular compartment at rest, after a meal and exercise with growth hormone replacement therapy (GH-RT) of hypopituitary patients (n = 11). The topology of linear relationships (| r | ≥ 0.7, P ≤ 0.01) and mutual dependencies exposed the organization of metabolic relationships in three entities reflecting basal and exercise-induced metabolic rate, triglyceride handling, and substrate utilization in the pre- and postprandial state, respectively. GH-RT improved aerobic performance (+5%), lean-to-fat mass (+19%), and muscle area of tibialis anterior (+2%) but did not alter its mitochondrial and capillary content. Concomitantly, connectivity was established between myocellular parameters of mitochondrial lipid metabolism and meal-induced triglyceride handling in serum. This was mediated via the recruitment of transcripts of muscle lipid mobilization (LIPE, FABP3, and FABP4) and fatty acid-sensitive transcription factors (PPARA, PPARG) to the metabolic network. The interdependence of gene regulatory elements of muscle lipid metabolism reflected the norm in healthy subjects (n = 12) and distinguished the regulation of the mitochondrial respiration factor COX1 by GH and endurance exercise. Our observations validate the use of network analysis for systems medicine and highlight the notion that an improved stochiometry between muscle and whole body lipid metabolism, rather than alterations of single bottlenecks, contributes to GH-driven elevations in metabolic fitness.

Comparative acute effects of the calcium channel blockers tiapamil, nisoldipine, and nifedipine on blood pressure and some regulatory factors in normal and hypertensive subjects

To clarify the pharmacological profile of the two new calcium channel blockers tiapamil and nisoldipine in humans, their acute effects as compared with those of the reference agent nifedipine were assessed in 10 normal subjects and 10 patients with essential hypertension. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), plasma and urinary catecholamine, sodium and potassium, plasma renin and aldosterone levels, and urinary prostaglandin E2 and F2 excretion rates were determined before and up to 4 or 5 h (urine values) after intravenous injection of placebo (20 ml 0.9% NaCl), tiapamil 1 mg/kg body weight, nisoldipine 6 micrograms/kg, or nifedipine 15 micrograms/kg. The four studies were performed at weekly intervals according to Latin square design. All three calcium channel blockers significantly (p less than 0.05 or lower) lowered BP and distinctly increased sodium excretion in hypertensive patients, but had only little influence on these parameters in normal subjects. HR was increased in both groups. Changes in BP and HR were maximal at 5 min and largely dissipated 3 h after drug injection. Effects on BP and HR, as well as concomitant mild increases in plasma norepinephrine and renin levels that occurred in both groups, tended to be more pronounced (about double) following nisoldipine than following tiapamil or nifedipine at the dosages given. Plasma aldosterone, epinephrine levels, and prostaglandin excretion rates were not consistently modified. These findings demonstrate that tiapamil and nisoldipine possess distinct antihypertensive properties in humans. Different chronotropic and renin-activating effects of different calcium channel blockers may be determined, at least in part, by a different influence on sympathetic activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Regulatory Objectives for Contemporary Electronic Communications : Talking Business or Talking Culture?

The common mantra in telecommunications regulatory fora (be it national, regional or international) now goes along the lines of 'deregulation-good; regulation-bad' and competition is said to be the ultimate answer to basically every question. A generalised dictum like this is in itself suspicious and even more so, when it refers to a sector such as telecommunications, which has a history of heavy regulation and has been the very epitome of state intervention. In the contemporary environment of vibrant communications, subcribing to a purely 'black-or-white' aproach may be, to put it mildly, unsafe. Before answering the question of appropriate regulatory model for communications markets, it is essential to figure out what goals are to be pursued in order to consider what kind of measures could bring about their attainment. In the words of Robert Bork, 'only when the issue of goals has been settled is it possible to frame a coherent body of substantive rules'. Against this backdrop, the present paper looks into the goals and objectives of telecommunications regulation, their complexity and inherent tension between commercial and public interests.