Randomised trial of a clinical dosing algorithm to start anticoagulation with phenprocoumon

Prospective validation of two algorithms for the initiation of phenprocoumon treatment.

Treatment of portal vein thrombosis by thrombectomy and regional thrombolysis

BACKGROUND. Portal vein thrombosis is a rare disorder. The prognosis of both the acute and the chronic forms is determined by the resulting acute or chronic portal hypertension. The therapeutic approach of choice is controversial. METHODS. A case of etiologically unclear thrombosis of the portal vein system in a young man is reported, which was treated successfully by means of portal vein thrombectomy combined with intraoperative and postoperative thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA). RESULTS. Initial thrombectomy established sufficient venous return. However, rethrombosis of the portal vein occurred 2 days later. In a second operation rethrombectomy was followed by intraoperative regional application of rTPA, which was continued after operation during a period of 48 hours through a catheter inserted in a mesenteric vein. Patency of the portal system was confirmed 1 week after the procedure. The 1-year follow-up reconfirmed this result (through indirect portography and Doppler sonography). The patient received the anticoagulant phenprocoumon. CONCLUSIONS. The combination of surgical thrombectomy and regional thrombolysis with rTPA could offer a feasible therapeutic option for selected patients with acute prehepatic portal vein thrombosis.

Rhabdomyolysis in association with simvastatin and amiodarone

OBJECTIVE To report a case of severe myopathy associated with concomitant simvastatin and amiodarone therapy. CASE SUMMARY A 63-year-old white man with underlying insulin-dependent diabetes, recent coronary artery bypass surgery, and postoperative hemiplegia was treated with aspirin, metoprolol, furosemide, nitroglycerin, and simvastatin. Due to recurrent atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon and antiarrhythmic treatment with amiodarone were initiated. Four weeks after starting simvastatin 40 mg/day and 2 weeks after initiating amiodarone 1 g/day for 10 days, then 200 mg/day, he developed diffuse muscle pain with generalized muscular weakness. Laboratory investigations revealed a significant increase of creatine kinase (CK) peaking at 40 392 U/L. Due to a suspected drug interaction of simvastatin with amiodarone, both drugs were stopped. CK normalized over the following 8 days, and the patient made an uneventful recovery. An objective causality assessment revealed that the myopathy was probably related to simvastatin. DISCUSSION Myopathy is a rare but potentially severe adverse reaction associated with statins. Besides high statin doses, concomitant use of fibrates, defined comorbidities, and concurrent use of inhibitors of cytochrome P450 are important additional risk factors. This is especially relevant if statins predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 are combined with inhibitors of this isoenzyme. Amiodarone is a potent inhibitor of several different CYP isoenzymes, including CYP3A4. CONCLUSIONS Avoiding the concomitant use of drugs with the potential to inhibit CYP-dependent metabolism (eg, amiodarone) or elimination of statins may decrease the risk of statin-associated myopathy. Alternatively, if drug therapy with a potent CYP inhibitor is inevitable, choosing a statin without relevant CYP metabolism (eg, pravastatin) should be considered.

General Practitioners' vitamin K antagonist monitoring is associated with better blood pressure control in patients with hypertension - a cross-sectional database study.

BACKGROUND Patients requiring anticoagulation suffer from comorbidities such as hypertension. On the occasion of INR monitoring, general practitioners (GPs) have the opportunity to control for blood pressure (BP). We aimed to evaluate the impact of Vitamin-K Antagonist (VKA) monitoring by GPs on BP control in patients with hypertension. METHODS We cross-sectionally analyzed the database of the Swiss Family Medicine ICPC Research using Electronic Medical Records (FIRE) of 60 general practices in a primary care setting in Switzerland. This database includes 113,335 patients who visited their GP between 2009 and 2013. We identified patients with hypertension based on antihypertensive medication prescribed for ≥6 months. We compared patients with VKA for ≥3 months and patients without such treatment regarding BP control. We adjusted for age, sex, observation period, number of consultations and comorbidity. RESULTS We identified 4,412 patients with hypertension and blood pressure recordings in the FIRE database. Among these, 569 (12.9 %) were on Phenprocoumon (VKA) and 3,843 (87.1 %) had no anticoagulation. Mean systolic and diastolic BP was significantly lower in the VKA group (130.6 ± 14.9 vs 139.8 ± 15.8 and 76.6 ± 7.9 vs 81.3 ± 9.3 mm Hg) (p < 0.001 for both). The difference remained after adjusting for possible confounders. Systolic and diastolic BP were significantly lower in the VKA group, reaching a mean difference of -8.4 mm Hg (95 % CI -9.8 to -7.0 mm Hg) and -1.5 mm Hg (95 % CI -2.3 to -0.7 mm Hg), respectively (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS In a large sample of hypertensive patients in Switzerland, VKA treatment was independently associated with better systolic and diastolic BP control. The observed effect could be due to better compliance with antihypertensive medication in patients treated with VKA. Therefore, we conclude to be aware of this possible benefit especially in patients with lower expected compliance and with multimorbidity.