Arginine vasopressin in vasodilatory shock: effects on metabolism and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the effects of arginine vasopressin other than its vasoconstrictive and antidiuretic potential in vasodilatory shock. RECENT FINDINGS: Arginine vasopressin influences substrate metabolism by stimulation of hepatic glucose release, gluconeogenesis, ureogenesis and fatty acid esterification. Although arginine vasopressin is a secretagogue of different hormones, only prolactin increases during arginine vasopressin therapy. Plasmatic and cellular coagulation are affected by arginine vasopressin, resulting in thrombocyte aggregation. Therefore, platelet count typically decreases following arginine vasopressin infusion in critically ill patients. In addition, arginine vasopressin reduces bile flow and may increase bilirubin concentrations. Despite its potential to decrease serum sodium, no change in electrolytes was observed in critically ill patients receiving arginine vasopressin. Although arginine vasopressin is an endogenous antipyretic, body temperature is not decreased by central venous arginine vasopressin infusion. In addition, arginine vasopressin modulates immune function through V1 receptors. Compared with norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin may have protective effects on endothelial function. Net arginine vasopressin effects on gastrointestinal motility seem to be inhibitory and are dose dependent. SUMMARY: Except for its antidiuretic and vasoconstrictive actions, the effects of arginine vasopressin in patients with vasodilatory shock have so far only been partially examined. Potential influences of arginine vasopressin on metabolism and immune, liver and mitochondrial function remain to be assessed in future studies.

Tissue metabolomics of hepatocellular carcinoma: Tumor energy metabolism and the role of transcriptomic classification

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest causes of death from cancer. A plethora of metabolomic investigations of HCC have yielded molecules in biofluids that are both up- and down-regulated but no real consensus has emerged regarding exploitable biomarkers for early detection of HCC. We report here a different approach, a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics study of energy metabolism in HCC. A panel of 31 pairs of HCC tumors and corresponding nontumor liver tissues from the same patients was investigated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS)-based metabolomics. HCC was characterized by ∼2-fold depletion of glucose, glycerol 3- and 2-phosphate, malate, alanine, myo-inositol, and linoleic acid. Data are consistent with a metabolic remodeling involving a 4-fold increase in glycolysis over mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. A second panel of 59 HCC that had been typed by transcriptomics and classified in G1 to G6 subgroups was also subjected to GCMS tissue metabolomics. No differences in glucose, lactate, alanine, glycerol 3-phosphate, malate, myo-inositol, or stearic acid tissue concentrations were found, suggesting that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway activated by CTNNB1 mutation in subgroups G5 and G6 did not exhibit specific metabolic remodeling. However, subgroup G1 had markedly reduced tissue concentrations of 1-stearoylglycerol, 1-palmitoylglycerol, and palmitic acid, suggesting that the high serum α-fetoprotein phenotype of G1, associated with the known overexpression of lipid catabolic enzymes, could be detected through metabolomics as increased lipid catabolism. Conclusion: Tissue metabolomics yielded precise biochemical information regarding HCC tumor metabolic remodeling from mitochondrial oxidation to aerobic glycolysis and the impact of molecular subtypes on this process.