The future of osteoporosis treatment - a research update

Osteoporosis is characterised by a progressive loss of bone mass and microarchitecture which leads to increased fracture risk. Some of the drugs available to date have shown reductions in vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk. However, in the ageing population of industrialised countries, still more fractures happen today than are avoided, which highlights the large medical need for new treatment options, models, and strategies. Recent insights into bone biology, have led to a better understanding of bone cell functions and crosstalk between osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes at the molecular level. In the future, the armamentarium against osteoporotic fractures will likely be enriched by (1.) new bone anabolic substances such as antibodies directed against the endogenous inhibitors of bone formation sclerostin and dickkopf-1, PTH and PTHrp analogues, and possibly calcilytics; (2.) new inhibitors of bone resorption such as cathepsin K inhibitors which may suppress osteoclast function without impairing osteoclast viability and thus maintain bone formation by preserving the osteoclast-osteoblast crosstalk, and denosumab, an already widely available antibody against RANKL which inhibits osteoclast formation, function, and survival; and (3.) new therapeutic strategies based on an extended understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis which may include sequential therapies with two or more bone active substances aimed at optimising the management of bone capital acquired during adolescence and maintained during adulthood in terms of both quantity and quality. Finally, one of the future challenges will be to identify those patients and patient populations expected to benefit the most from a given drug therapy or regimen. The WHO fracture risk assessment tool FRAX® and improved access to bone mineral density measurements by DXA will play a key role in this regard.

PTH-related protein is released into the mother's bloodstream during location: evidence for beneficial effects on maternal calcium-phosphate metabolism

Recent studies have indicated that parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) may have important actions in lactation, affecting the mammary gland, and also calcium metabolism in the newborn and the mother. However, there are as yet no longitudinal studies to support the notion of an endocrine role of this peptide during nursing. We studied a group of 12 nursing mothers, mean age 32 years, after they had been nursing for an average of 7 weeks (B) and also 4 months after stopping nursing (A). It was assumed that changes occurring between A and B correspond to the effect of lactation. Blood was assayed for prolactin (PRL), PTHrP (two-site immunoradiometric assay with sheep antibody against PTHrP(1-40), and goat antibody against PTHrP(60-72), detection limit 0.3 pmol/l), intact PTH (iPTH), ionized calcium (Ca2+), 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), alkaline phosphatase (alkP), as well as for creatinine (Cr), protein, phosphorus (P), and total calcium (Ca). Fasting 2-h urine samples were analyzed for Ca excretion (CaE) and renal phosphate threshold (TmP/GFR). PRL was significantly higher during lactation than after weaning (39 +/- 10 vs. 13 +/- 9 micrograms/l; p = 0.018) and so was PTHrP (2.8 +/- 0.35 vs. 0.52 +/- 0.04 pmol/l; p = 0.002), values during lactation being above the normal limit (1.3 pmol/l) in all 12 mothers. There was a significant correlation between PRL and PTHrP during lactation (r = 0.8, p = 0.002). Whole blood Ca2+ did not significantly change from A (1.20 +/- 0.02 mmol/l) to B (1.22 +/- 0.02, mmol/l), whereas total Ca corrected for protein (2.18 +/- 0.02 mmol/l) or uncorrected (2.18 +/- 0.02 mmol/l) significantly rose during lactation (2.31 +/- 0.02 mmol/l, p = 0.003 and 2.37 +/- 0.03 mmol/l, p = 0.002, respectively). Conversely, iPTH decreased during lactation (3.47 +/- 0.38 vs. 2.11 +/- 0.35 pmol/l, A vs. B, p = 0.02). Serum-levels of 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 did not significantly change from A to B (23 +/- 2.3 vs. 24 +/- 1.9 ng/ml and 29.5 +/- 6.0 vs. 21.9 +/- 1.8 pg/ml, respectively). Both TmP/GFR and P were higher during lactation than after weaning (1.15 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.05 mmol/l GF, p = 0.003 and 1.25 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.96 +/- 0.05 mmol/l, p = 0.002, respectively) as was alkP (74.0 +/- 7.1 vs. 52.6 +/- 6.9 U/l, p = 0.003). CaE did not differ between A and B (0.015 +/- 0.003 vs. 0.017 +/- 0.003 mmol/l GF, A vs. B, NS). We conclude that lactation is accompanied by an increase in serum PRL. This is associated with a release of PTHrP into the maternal blood circulation. A rise in total plasma Ca ensues, probably in part by increased bone turnover as suggested by the elevation of alkP. PTH secretion falls, with a subsequent rise of TmP/GFR and plasma P despite high plasma levels of PTHrP.