Hybrid bodies in cyborg sports? The case of Oscar Pistorius

The capabilities of postmodern biotechnology inevitably lead to questioning if it is morally acceptable to use all possibilities offered by technology. In sport, this very complex issue is dealt with by drawing clear boundaries between naturalness and artificiality. Currently, new biotechnology is constantly being produced and with this, boundaries between naturalness and artificiality, between normal and abnormal, human and hybrid are constantly shifting . “Human enhancement” is a fascinating prism that reflects contemporary questions of participation, justice, equality and the autonomy of the subject in all social fields. The area of elite sports is particularly affected by “human enhancement”, according to the principle of exceeding what has come before, of aiming higher, faster and further. This paper analyses the postulated “naturalness” in the regulative and normalising function in the area of elite sports, in connection with Foucault’s theory of governmentality. The example of the South African sprinter Oscar Pistorius appears to be particularly suited to illustrate current definition difficulties in the area of disabled and non-disabled people in differentiated competitive sports. His is a vivid example of a multifaceted body-sociological analysis of current sport culture and the construction of reality or naturalness in the framework of the discourse of drafting and negotiating the accreditation for sprint competitions of non-disabled athletes, most recently in the London Olympics 2012. Using the case study of Oscar Pistorius, the negotiating processes in relation to the argumentation logic, dynamics and resistance in shifting distinctions are presented in detail using the fundamental documents of the IOC, IPC, CAS and IAAF. Represented through the inclusion and exclusion processes are hierarchies of the body that are (re)consolidated and transformed. The central question emerges as to how the worth of equal opportunity and fairness in regard to “naturalness” can be reconsolidated or transformed.

Quality control for retinal OCT in multiple sclerosis: validation of the OSCAR-IB criteria.

BACKGROUND Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) permits quantification of retinal layer atrophy relevant to assessment of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Measurement artefacts may limit the use of OCT to MS research. OBJECTIVE An expert task force convened with the aim to provide guidance on the use of validated quality control (QC) criteria for the use of OCT in MS research and clinical trials. METHODS A prospective multi-centre (n = 13) study. Peripapillary ring scan QC rating of an OCT training set (n = 50) was followed by a test set (n = 50). Inter-rater agreement was calculated using kappa statistics. Results were discussed at a round table after the assessment had taken place. RESULTS The inter-rater QC agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.7). Disagreement was found highest for judging signal strength (kappa = 0.40). Future steps to resolve these issues were discussed. CONCLUSION Substantial agreement for QC assessment was achieved with aid of the OSCAR-IB criteria. The task force has developed a website for free online training and QC certification. The criteria may prove useful for future research and trials in MS using OCT as a secondary outcome measure in a multi-centre setting.

OSCAR – ein internetbasiertes Unterstützungsprogramm für Angehörige von Menschen mit einer Hirnverletzung: Pilotstudie

Erhöhte Depressivität und Ängstlichkeit sowie ein erhöhtes subjektives Belastungserleben sind bei Angehörigen von Menschen mit einer Hirnverletzung häufig. Die vorliegende Pilotuntersuchung widmet sich der Evaluation einer neuartigen Intervention, dem OSCAR Online-Coaching, einer internetbasierten Mehrkomponentenintervention. In einer randomisierten, kontrollierten Pilotstudie mit 35 TeilnehmerInnen wurde ein 16-wöchiges therapeutengeleitetes Selbsthilfeprogramm mit einer Wartekontrollgruppe verglichen. Als primäre Ergebnismasse wurde der Perceived Stress Questionnaire und das Zarit Burden Interview eingesetzt. Intention-to-treat-Analysen der unmittelbaren Effekte direkt nach der Intervention zeigten keine signifikanten Gruppenunterschiede auf den primären und auf sekundären Ergebnismassen. Im 6-Monate Follow-up, nach Zugang der Kontrollgruppe zur Intervention, wurde in der Gesamtstichprobe eine signifikante Reduktion des Caregiver Burden, depressiver Symptome, der Angst, sowie eine Zunahme positiver Emotionen gefunden. Die Zufriedenheit mit dem Programm war gut.