Quality evaluation of tandem mass spectral libraries

Tandem mass spectral libraries are gaining more and more importance for the identification of unknowns in different fields of research, including metabolomics, forensics, toxicology, and environmental analysis. Particularly, the recent invention of reliable, robust, and transferable libraries has increased the general acceptance of these tools. Herein, we report on results obtained from thorough evaluation of the match reliabilities of two tandem mass spectral libraries: the MSforID library established by the Oberacher group in Innsbruck and the Weinmann library established by the Weinmann group in Freiburg. Three different experiments were performed: (1) Spectra of the libraries were searched against their corresponding library after excluding either this single compound-specific spectrum or all compound-specific spectra prior to searching; (2) the libraries were searched against each other using either library as reference set or sample set; (3) spectra acquired on different mass spectrometric instruments were matched to both libraries. Almost 13,000 tandem mass spectra were included in this study. The MSforID search algorithm was used for spectral matching. Statistical evaluation of the library search results revealed that principally both libraries enable the sensitive and specific identification of compounds. Due to higher mass accuracy of the QqTOF compared with the QTrap instrument, matches to the MSforID library were more reliable when comparing spectra with both libraries. Furthermore, only the MSforID library was shown to be efficiently transferable to different kinds of tandem mass spectrometers, including "tandem-in-time" instruments; this is due to the coverage of a large range of different collision energy settings-including the very low range-which is an outstanding characteristics of the MSforID library.

Simultaneous Multiscale Polyaffine Registration by Incorporating Deformation Statistics

Locally affine (polyaffine) image registration methods capture intersubject non-linear deformations with a low number of parameters, while providing an intuitive interpretation for clinicians. Considering the mandible bone, anatomical shape differences can be found at different scales, e.g. left or right side, teeth, etc. Classically, sequential coarse to fine registration are used to handle multiscale deformations, instead we propose a simultaneous optimization of all scales. To avoid local minima we incorporate a prior on the polyaffine transformations. This kind of groupwise registration approach is natural in a polyaffine context, if we assume one configuration of regions that describes an entire group of images, with varying transformations for each region. In this paper, we reformulate polyaffine deformations in a generative statistical model, which enables us to incorporate deformation statistics as a prior in a Bayesian setting. We find optimal transformations by optimizing the maximum a posteriori probability. We assume that the polyaffine transformations follow a normal distribution with mean and concentration matrix. Parameters of the prior are estimated from an initial coarse to fine registration. Knowing the region structure, we develop a blockwise pseudoinverse to obtain the concentration matrix. To our knowledge, we are the first to introduce simultaneous multiscale optimization through groupwise polyaffine registration. We show results on 42 mandible CT images.

Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn? (Editorial)

Peer review procedures and citation statistics are important yet often neglected components of the scientific publication process. Here I discuss fundamental consequences of such quality measures for the scientific community and propose three remedial actions: (1) use of a ''Combined Impact Estimate'' as a measure of citation statistics, (2) adoption of an open reviewing policy and (3) acceleration of the publication process in order to raise the reputation of the entire discipline (in our case: behavioural science). Authors, reviewers and editors are invited to contribute to the improvement of publication practice.