Positive effect of the yellow morph on female reproductive success in the flower colour polymorphic Iris lutescens (Iridaceae), a deceptive species

The deceptive Iris lutescens (Iridaceae) shows a heritable and striking flower colour polymorphism, with both yellow- and purple-flowered individuals growing sympatrically. Deceptive species with flower colour polymorphism are mainly described in the family Orchidaceae and rarely found in other families. To explain the maintenance of flower colour polymorphism in I.lutescens, we investigated female reproductive success in natural populations of southern France, at both population and local scales (within populations). Female reproductive success was positively correlated with yellow morph frequency, at both the population scale and the local scale. Therefore, we failed to observe negative frequency-dependent selection (NFDS), a mechanism commonly invoked to explain flower colour polymorphism in deceptive plant species. Flower size and local flower density could also affect female reproductive success in natural populations. Pollinator behaviour could explain the positive effect of the yellow morph, and our results suggest that flower colour polymorphism might not persist in I.lutescens, but alternative explanations not linked to pollinator behaviour are discussed. In particular, NFDS, although an appealingly simple explanation previously demonstrated in orchids, may not always contribute to maintaining flower colour polymorphism, even in deceptive species.

Minimally invasive surgery technique for re-enclavation of prepupillary iris-claw IOLs

BACKGROUND Disenclavation is a common complication of prepupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses (IOL). We present a new minimally invasive revision surgery technique for reenclavation of prepupillary iris-claw IOLs using standard 23 Gauge (G) vitrectomy instruments. HISTORY AND SIGNS Three cases of revision surgery by unilaterally dislocated prepupillary iris-claw IOLs are presented. THERAPY AND OUTCOME Two 20 G sideports 90 degrees apart were constructed. Healon 10® was injected to maintain the anterior chamber. A standard enclavation needle was introduced to rotate the optic into correct position and a 23 G endgrasping forceps was used to grasp and stabilize the IOL for enclavation. The reenclavation was successful in all three cases and the mean visual acuity improved from preoperatively 0.1 (range counting fingers [CF] to 0.25) to 0.6 (range 0.4 to 0.8) with no significant induction of astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS This minimally invasive reenclavation technique for repositioning of the prepupillary iris claw IOL appears to lead to successful and rapid visual rehabilitation.