Pitfalls when examining gap junction hemichannels: interference from volume-regulated anion channels

Human HeLa cells transfected with mouse connexin45 were used to explore the experimental conditions suitable to measure currents carried by gap junction hemichannels. Experiments were performed with a voltage-clamp technique and whole-cell recording. Lowering [Ca(2+)](o) from 2 mM to 20 nM evoked an extra current, I (m), putatively carried by Cx45 hemichannels. However, the variability of I (m) (size, voltage sensitivity, kinetics) suggested the involvement of other channels. The finding that growth medium in the incubator increased the osmolarity with time implied that volume-regulated anion channels (VRAC) may participate. This assumption was reinforced by the following observations. On the one hand, keeping [Ca(2+)](o) normal while the osmolarity of the extracellular solution was reduced from 310 to 290 mOsm yielded a current characteristic of VRAC; I (VRAC) activated/deactivated at negative/positive voltage, giving rise to the conductance functions g (VRAC,inst)=f(V (m)) (inst: instantaneous; V (m): membrane potential) and g (VRAC,ss)=f(V (m)) (ss: steady state). Moreover, it was reversibly inhibited by mibefradil, a Cl(-)channel blocker (binding constant K (d)=38 microM, Hill coefficient n=12), but not by the gap junction channel blocker 18alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid. On the other hand, minimizing the osmotic imbalance while [Ca(2+)](o) was reduced led to a current typical for Cx45 hemichannels; I (hc) activated/deactivated at positive/negative voltage. Furthermore, it was reversibly inhibited by 18alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid or palmitoleic acid, but not by mibefradil. Computations based on g (VRAC,ss)=f(V (m)) and g (hc,ss)=f(V (m)) indicated that the concomitant operation of both currents results in a bell-shaped conductance-voltage relationship. The functional implications of the data presented are discussed. Conceivably, VRAC and hemichannels are involved in a common signaling pathway.

Firm Building and Entrepreneurship in Second-Tier High-Tech Regions

This paper examines how a second-tier high-technology region leveraged corporate assets—mostly from transnational firms—in building a knowledge-based economy. The paper reviews how firm building and entrepreneurship influence the evolution of a peripheral regional economy. Using a case study of Boise, Idaho (the US), the research highlights several important sources of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial firm formation is closely linked with a region's ability to grow incubator organizations, particularly innovative firms. These innovative firms provide the training ground for entrepreneurs. Firms, however, differ and the ways in which firm building activities influence regional entrepreneurship depend on firm strategy and organization. Thus, second-tier high-tech regions in the US are taking a different path than their well-known counterparts such as Silicon Valley or Route 128 around Boston.

Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions

Adult honey bees are maintained in vitro in laboratory cages for a variety of purposes. For example, researchers may wish to perform experiments on honey bees caged individually or in groups to study aspects of parasitology, toxicology, or physiology under highly controlled conditions, or they may cage whole frames to obtain newly emerged workers of known age cohorts. Regardless of purpose, researchers must manage a number of variables, ranging from selection of study subjects (e.g. honey bee subspecies) to experimental environment (e.g. temperature and relative humidity). Although decisions made by researchers may not necessarily jeopardize the scientific rigour of an experiment, they may profoundly affect results, and may make comparisons with similar, but independent, studies difficult. Focusing primarily on workers, we provide recommendations for maintaining adults under in vitro laboratory conditions, whilst acknowledging gaps in our understanding that require further attention. We specifically describe how to properly obtain honey bees, and how to choose appropriate cages, incubator conditions, and food to obtain biologically relevant and comparable experimental results. Additionally, we provide broad recommendations for experimental design and statistical analyses of data that arises from experiments using caged honey bees. The ultimate goal of this, and of all COLOSS BEEBOOK papers, is not to stifle science with restrictions, but rather to provide researchers with the appropriate tools to generate comparable data that will build upon our current understanding of honey bees.