Mouse enrichment

The provision of environmental enrichment to mice used in research is a topic that generates often widely divergent opinions as to the value of this husbandry practice. The literature is replete with examples of the positive effects enrichment has on the animals’ welfare. However, many published studies have demonstrated that enrichment can impact research in unforeseen and unpredictable ways, and thus may pose a concern as a confounding variable. Indeed, an analysis of the outcomes of murine enrichment studies suggests that both views are accurate, and thus inclusion of environmental enrichment in the mouse cage should be done with the understanding that while the use of appropriate cage complexities can certainly enhance animal welfare and concomitantly provide a better animal model for scientific purposes, the wrong choice of enrichment may negatively impact the welfare of the animals or the research. This chapter describes our current understanding regarding the effects of several commonly used mouse enrichments.

Maximising the impact of research: the NCCR North-South approach: Fourth NCCR North-South Report on Effectiveness

Interest is growing in the impact that science can have on reducing poverty in the global South. If we understand impact as the “demonstrable contribution that excellent research makes to society and the economy”, the concept encompasses a variety of contributions of research-related knowledge and skills that benefit people and the environment. One reason for the growing interest in impact in this context is research councils’ increasing focus on documenting the social and environmental benefits of science, as indicated by the above quotation from the British research councils. Another reason is that research funding agencies from the private and public sectors are now more interested in social innovations for solving problems on the ground. Research can indeed influence policymakers’ views, policy development, funding patterns, and implementation or practice. This is promising for those who would like to improve – and prove – the influence research can have on policy and practice. It is also of importance for better understanding the intended and unintended effects of research. This report presents the NCCR North-South approach to increasing the impact of development-oriented research. It explains how we can maximise our impact and how we can assess whether our efforts have worked, based on six case studies from around the world. The report is of interest to all researchers who wish to respond to policy and practice from their point of view and who are keen on publicising their evidence. It is also relevant to those who teach how to maximise research impact.

Management of Joint Research Activities within ERA-ARD: Guidelines for ARD programme planning, monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment

The present document has been elaborated in the context of the ERA-ARD project “The Agricultural Research for Development (ARD) dimension of the European Research Area (ERA) “. It is based on work done within Task 3.2 to identify a set of common or compatible methodologies for ARD planning, monitoring and evaluation and impact assessment. This set should serve as a guide for the management of joint ARD activities that are presently developed within the framework of the ERA-ARD project.