Joint Reprocessing of GPS, GLONASS and SLR

A joint reprocessing of GPS, GLONASS and SLR observations has been carried out at TU Dresden, TU Munich, AIUB and ETH Zurich. Common a priori models have been applied for the processing of all types of observation to ensure both consistent parameter estimates and the rigorous combination of microwave and optical measurements. Based on that reprocessing results, we evaluate the impact of adding GLONASS observations to the standard GPS data processing. In particular, changes in station position time series and day boundary overlaps of consecutive satellite arcs are analyzed. In addition, the GNSS orbits derived from microwave measurements are validated using independent SLR range measurements. Our SLR residuals indicate a significant improvement compared to previous results. Furthermore, we evaluate the performance of our high-rate (30s) combined GNSS satellite clocks and discuss associated zero-difference phase residuals.

Earth gravity field recovery using GPS, GLONASS, and SLR satellites

The time variable Earth’s gravity field provides the information about mass transport within the system Earth, i.e., the relationship of mass transport between atmosphere, oceans, and land hydrology. We recover the low-degree parameters of the time variable gravity field using microwave observations from GPS and GLONASS satellites and from SLR data to five geodetic satellites, namely LAGEOS-1/2, Starlette, Stella, and AJISAI. GPS satellites are particularly sensitive to specific coefficients of the Earth's gravity field, because of the deep 2:1 orbital resonance with Earth rotation (two revolutions of the GPS satellites per sidereal day). The resonant coefficients cause, among other, a “secular” drift (actually periodic variations of very long periods) of the semi-major axes of up to 5.3 m/day of GPS satellites. We processed 10 years of GPS and GLONASS data using the standard orbit models from the Center of Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) with a simultaneous estimation of the Earth gravity field coefficients and other parameters, e.g., satellite orbit parameters, station coordinates, Earth rotation parameters, troposphere delays, etc. The weekly GNSS gravity solutions up to degree and order 4/4 are compared to the weekly SLR gravity field solutions. The SLR-derived geopotential coefficients are compared to monthly GRACE and CHAMP results.