Teachers' Acculturation Attitudes and their Classroom Management: an empirical study among fifth-grade primary school teachers in Switzerland

This article investigates the influence of attitudes towards acculturation of 180 primary school teachers on their classroom management. The results indicate that teachers with integrative attitudes towards immigrant students' acculturation have a high propensity to punish students for disruptive behaviour, but they also demonstrate high levels of diagnostic expertise in social areas. Teachers with assimilative attitudes are also likely to punish students for misbehaviour, but tend to have a deficiency in the ability to diagnose social tensions among students. Teachers with assimilative attitudes who report high levels of disruptive behaviour in their classroom have the strongest tendency to punish and the lowest level of diagnostic expertise in social areas.

Wahrnehmung und Interpretation von Unterrichtsstörungen aus Schülerperspektive sowie aus Sicht der Lehrpersonen.

The contribution is based on an understanding of teaching as an interaction system that encompasses all parties in the classroom. Social order in classrooms is established through mutual awareness, which includes the perception of classroom disruptions. Using qualitative data, this paper examines the extent to which students’ and teachers’ perspectives coincide with respect to both the perception of classroom disruptions and the teachers’ reaction to discipline disruptions. For this purpose, classrooms were categorized into either infrequent-disruption or frequent-disruption classrooms. The results show, firstly, a high correspondence between teachers’ and students’ perception of classroom disruptions; secondly, a self-serving bias in the teachers’ perception of their own reactions on discipline disruptions; and thirdly, a different interpretation of the term discipline disruption in infrequent- and frequent-disruption classrooms. The possibility that teachers themselves might cause classroom disruptions is discussed. In addition, the concept of classroom management is put into perspective.

Monitoring and Assessment of Desertification and Land Degradation: Knowledge Management, Institutions and Economics: White Paper of the DSD Working Group 3

The White Paper is a review of leading scientific knowledge on the role of knowledge management, institutions and economics in monitoring and assessment of land degradation and desertification. It provides key recommendations for more effective policies and actions for combating desertification both withn the UNCCD and beyond. This White Paper is the result of an international collaboration and consultation led jointly by the Association of DesertNet International and the United Nations University - Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), of the Dryland Science for Development Consortium (DSD). The findings were presented at the First UNCCD Scientific Conference held during the COP-9 in Buenos Aires, 2009.