Surgical cryoablation for ventricular tachyarrhythmia arising from the left ventricular outflow tract region.

BACKGROUND Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) region can be inaccessible for ablation because of epicardial fat or overlying coronary arteries. OBJECTIVE We describe surgical cryoablation of this type of VA. METHODS From March 2009 to 2014, 190 consecutive patients with VAs originating from the LVOT underwent ablation at our institution. Four patients (2%) underwent surgical cryoablation for highly symptomatic VAs after failing catheter ablation. RESULTS In all patients, endocardial or percutaneous epicardial mapping was consistent with origin in the LVOT. In 2 patients, the points of earliest activation during VAs were marked with a bipolar pacing lead in the overlying cardiac vein for guidance during surgery. Surgical cryoablation was successful in 3 of the 4 patients. The fourth patient subsequently had successful endocardial catheter ablation. During a mean follow-up of 22 ± 16 months (range 4-42 months), all patients showed abolition of or marked reduction in symptomatic VA. However, 1 patient subsequently required percutaneous intervention to the left anterior descending coronary artery; another developed progressive left ventricular systolic dysfunction caused by nonischemic cardiomyopathy; and a third patient underwent permanent pacemaker implantation because of complete atrioventricular block after concomitant aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSION Surgical cryoablation is an option for highly symptomatic drug-resistant VAs emanating from the LVOT region. Despite extensive preoperative mapping, the procedure is not effective for all patients, and coronary injury is a risk.

Coronary artery injury due to catheter ablation in adults: presentations and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Currently, only anecdotal information exists on the presentation and outcome of coronary arterial injury after ablation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four patients who sustained coronary artery injury of a cohort of patients undergoing 4655 consecutive ablation procedures (0.09%) are described. The patients' mean age was 45+/-11 years, and 1.8+/-0.5 prior ablation attempts had been unsuccessful. Coronary injury occurred from epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation in 2 patients (irrigated radiofrequency ablation in one and cryoablation in the other) and ablation within the middle cardiac vein with irrigated radiofrequency in 2 patients. All involved branches of the right coronary artery. Acute occlusion presenting with ST-segment elevation immediately after ablation was recognized during the procedure in 2 cases. Occlusion failed to respond to nitroglycerin or balloon dilation, and stenting was required in both cases. Acute myocardial infarction occurred 2 weeks after epicardial ablation as a result of occlusion of a right ventricular branch of the right coronary artery giving rise to the posterior descending coronary artery in 1 patient. A moderate asymptomatic stenosis was seen on angiography after epicardial cryoablation in 1 patient. All patients recovered and remained asymptomatic from the coronary injury and arrhythmias during 37+/-53 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary arterial injury after ablation procedures is rare. It may present acutely or several weeks after an ablation procedure. Acute occlusion appears to require coronary stenting. Unanticipated anatomic variations can predispose to coronary injury.

Role of alternative interventional procedures when endo- and epicardial catheter ablation attempts for ventricular arrhythmias fail.

BACKGROUND Ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and standard percutaneous catheter ablation techniques portends a poor prognosis. We characterized the reasons for ablation failure and describe alternative interventional procedures in this high-risk group. METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-seven patients with VT refractory to 4±2 antiarrhythmic drugs and 2±1 previous endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation attempts underwent transcoronary ethanol ablation, surgical epicardial window (Epi-window), or surgical cryoablation (OR-Cryo; age, 62±11 years; VT storm in 52%). Failure of endo/epicardial ablation attempts was because of VT of intramural origin (35 patients), nonendocardial origin with prohibitive epicardial access because of pericardial adhesions (16), and anatomic barriers to ablation (8). In 8 patients, VT was of nonendocardial origin with a coexisting condition also requiring cardiac surgery. Transcoronary ethanol ablation alone was attempted in 37 patients, OR-Cryo alone in 21 patients, and a combination of transcoronary ethanol ablation and OR-Cryo (5 patients), or transcoronary ethanol ablation and Epi-window (4 patients), in the remainder. Overall, alternative interventional procedures abolished ≥1 inducible VT and terminated storm in 69% and 74% of patients, respectively, although 25% of patients had at least 1 complication. By 6 months post procedures, there was a significant reduction in defibrillator shocks (from a median of 8 per month to 1; P<0.001) and antiarrhythmic drug requirement although 55% of patients had at least 1 VT recurrence, and mortality was 17%. CONCLUSIONS A collaborative strategy of alternative interventional procedures offers the possibility of achieving arrhythmia control in high-risk patients with VT that is otherwise uncontrollable with antiarrhythmic drugs and standard percutaneous catheter ablation techniques.