Type D Personality, Self-Efficacy, and Medication Adherence Following an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Objective: To assess the relationship among Type D personality, self-efficacy, and medication adherence in patients with coronary heart disease. Methods: The study design was prospective and observational. Type D personality, self-efficacy for illness management behaviors, and medication adherence were measured 3 weeks after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome in 165 patients (mean [standard deviation] age = 61.62 [10.61] years, 16% women). Self-reported medication adherence was measured 6 months later in 118 of these patients. Multiple linear regression and mediation analyses were used to address the study research questions. Results: Using the original categorical classification, 30% of patients with acute coronary syndrome were classified as having Type D personality. Categorically defined patients with Type D personality had significantly poorer medication adherence at 6 months (r = j0.29, p G .01). Negative affectivity (NA; r = j0.25, p = .01) and social inhibition (r = j0.19, p = .04), the components of Type D personality, were associated with medication adherence 6 months after discharge in bivariate analyses. There was no evidence for the interaction of NA and social inhibition, that is, Type D personality, in the prediction of medication adherence 6 months after discharge in multivariate analysis. The observed association between NA and medication adherence 6 months after discharge could be partly explained by indirect effects through self-efficacy in mediation analysis (coefficient = j0.012; 95% bias-corrected and accelerated confidence interval = j0.036 to j0.001). Conclusions: The present data suggest the primacy of NA over the Type D personality construct in predicting medication adherence. Lower levels of self-efficacy may be a mediator between higher levels of NA and poor adherence to medication in patients with coronary heart disease.

Metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes: detection with diffusion-weighted MR imaging

PURPOSE To prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with prostate and/or bladder cancer staged as N0 with preoperative cross-sectional imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by an independent ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients with no enlarged lymph nodes on preoperative cross-sectional images who were scheduled for radical resection of the primary tumor and extended pelvic lymph node dissection were enrolled. All patients were examined with a 3-T MR unit, and examinations included conventional and DW MR imaging of the entire pelvis. Image analysis was performed by three independent readers blinded to any clinical information. Metastases were diagnosed on the basis of high signal intensity on high b value DW MR images and morphologic features (shape, border). Histopathologic examination served as the standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained with the bootstrap method. The Fleiss and Cohen κ and median test were applied for statistical analyses. RESULTS A total of 4846 lymph nodes were resected in 120 patients. Eighty-eight lymph node metastases were found in 33 of 120 patients (27.5%). Short-axis diameter of these metastases was less than or equal to 3 mm in 68, more than 3 mm to 5 mm in 13, more than 5 mm to 8 mm in five; and more than 8 mm in two. On a per-patient level, the three readers correctly detected metastases in 26 (79%; 95% CI: 64%, 91%), 21 (64%; 95% CI: 45%, 79%), and 25 (76%; 95% CI: 60%, 90%) of the 33 patients with metastases, with respective specificities of 85% (95% CI: 78%, 92%), 79% (95% CI: 70%, 88%), and 84% (95% CI: 76%, 92%). Analyzed according to hemipelvis, lymph node metastases were detected with histopathologic examination in 44 of 240 pelvic sides (18%); the three readers correctly detected these on DW MR images in 26 (59%; 95% CI: 45%, 73%), 19 (43%; 95% CI: 27%, 57%), and 28 (64%; 95% CI: 47%, 78%) of the 44 cases. CONCLUSION DW MR imaging enables noninvasive detection of small lymph node metastases in normal-sized nodes in a substantial percentage of patients with prostate and bladder cancer diagnosed as N0 with conventional cross-sectional imaging techniques.

Determinanten kognitiver Angstmanifestation während schulischer Tests: Eine Längsschnittstudie

Theoretischer Hintergrund und Fragestellung: Schulische Tests dienen der Feststellung von Wissen und Können. Wie jede Messung kann auch diese durch Störvariablen verzerrt werden. Während Tests erlebte Angst ist ein solcher potentieller Störeinfluss: Angst kann Testleistungen beinträchtigen, da sie sich hinderlich auf die Informationsverarbeitung auswirken kann (Störung des Wissensabrufs und des Denkens; Zeidner, 1998). Dieser kognitiven Angstmanifestation (Rost & Schermer, 1997) liegt die angstbedingte automatische Aufmerksamkeitsorientierung auf aufgaben-irrelevante Gedanken während der Testbearbeitung zugrunde (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos & Calvo, 2007). Es hat sich allerdings gezeigt, dass Angst nicht grundsätzlich mit Testleistungseinbußen einhergeht (Eysenck et al., 2007). Wir gehen davon aus, dass die Kapazität zur Selbstkontrolle bzw. Aufmerksamkeitsregulation (Baumeister, Muraven & Tice, 2000; Schmeichel & Baumeister, 2010) ein Faktor ist, der bedingt, wie stark kognitive Angstmanifestation während Tests und damit zusammenhängende Leistungseinbußen auftreten. Ängstliche Lernende mit höherer Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität sollten ihrer automatischen Aufmerksamkeitsorientierung auf aufgaben-irrelevante Gedanken erfolgreicher entgegensteuern und ihre Aufmerksamkeit weiterhin auf die Aufgabenbearbeitung richten können. Dem entsprechend sollten sie trotz Angst weniger kognitive Angstmanifestation während Tests erleben als ängstliche Lernende mit geringerer Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität. Auch die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und das Selbstwertgefühl sind Variablen, die in der Vergangenheit mit der Bewältigung von Angst und Stress in Verbindung gebracht wurden (Bandura, 1977; Baumeister, Campbell, Krueger & Vohs, 2003). Daher wurden diese Variablen als weitere Prädiktoren berücksichtigt. Es wurde die Hypothese getestet, dass die dispositionelle Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität über die dispositionelle Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und das dispositionelle Selbstwertgefühl hinaus Veränderungen in der kognitiven Angstmanifestation während Mathematiktests in einer Wirtschaftsschülerstichprobe vorhersagt. Es wurde des Weiteren davon ausgegangen, dass eine indirekte Verbindung zwischen der Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität und der Veränderung in den Mathematiknoten, vermittelt über die Veränderung in der kognitiven Angstmanifestation, besteht. Methode: Einhundertachtundfünfzig Wirtschaftsschüler bearbeiteten im September 2011 (T1) einen Fragebogen, der die folgenden Messungen enthielt:-Subskala Kognitive Angstmanifestation aus dem Differentiellen Leistungsangstinventar (Rost & Schermer, 1997) bezogen auf Mathematiktests (Sparfeldt, Schilling, Rost, Stelzl & Peipert, 2005); Alpha = .90; -Skala zur dispositionellen Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität (Bertrams & Englert, 2013); Alpha = .88; -Skala zur Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995); Alpha = .83; -Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl (von Collani & Herzberg, 2003); Alpha = .83; -Angabe der letzten Mathematikzeugnisnote. Im Februar 2012 (T2), also nach 5 Monaten und kurz nach dem Erhalt des Halbjahreszeugnisses, gaben die Schüler erneut ihre kognitive Angstmanifestation während Mathematiktests (Alpha = .93) und ihre letzte Mathematikzeugnisnote an. Ergebnisse: Die Daten wurden mittels Korrelationsanalyse, multipler Regressionsanalyse und Bootstrapping ausgewertet. Die Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität, die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und das Selbstwertgefühl (alle zu T1) waren positiv interkorreliert, r= .50/.59/.59. Diese Variablen wurden gemeinsam als Prädiktoren in ein Regressionsmodell zur Vorhersage der kognitiven Angstmanifestation zu T2 eingefügt. Gleichzeitig wurde die kognitive Angstmanifestation zu T1 konstant gehalten. Es zeigte sich, dass die Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität erwartungskonform die Veränderungen in der kognitiven Angstmanifestation vorhersagte, Beta = -.21, p= .02. Das heißt, dass höhere Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität zu T1 mit verringerter kognitiver Angstmanifestation zu T2 einherging. Die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Beta = .12, p= .14, und das Selbstwertgefühl, Beta = .05, p= .54, hatten hingegen keinen eigenen Vorhersagewert für die Veränderungen in der kognitiven Angstmanifestation. Des Weiteren ergab eine Mediationsanalyse mittels Bootstrapping (bias-corrected bootstrap 95% confidence interval, 5000 resamples; siehe Hayes & Scharkow, in press), dass die Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität (T1), vermittelt über die Veränderung in der kognitiven Angstmanifestation, indirekt mit der Veränderung in der Mathematikleistung verbunden war (d.h. das Bootstrap-Konfidenzintervall schloss nicht die Null ein; CI [0.01, 0.24]). Für die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und das Selbstwertgefühl fand sich keine analoge indirekte Verbindung zur Mathematikleistung. Fazit: Die Befunde verweisen auf die Bedeutsamkeit der Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität für die Bewältigung kognitiver Angstreaktionen während schulischer Tests. Losgelöst von der Aufmerksamkeitsregulationskapazität scheinen positive Erwartungen und ein positives Selbstbild keine protektive Wirkung hinsichtlich der leistungsbeeinträchtigenden kognitiven Angstmanifestation während Mathematiktests zu besitzen.

Correcting mortality for loss to follow-up: a nomogram applied to antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa

Background The World Health Organization estimates that in sub-Saharan Africa about 4 million HIV-infected patients had started antiretroviral therapy (ART) by the end of 2008. Loss of patients to follow-up and care is an important problem for treatment programmes in this region. As mortality is high in these patients compared to patients remaining in care, ART programmes with high rates of loss to follow-up may substantially underestimate mortality of all patients starting ART. Methods and Findings We developed a nomogram to correct mortality estimates for loss to follow-up, based on the fact that mortality of all patients starting ART in a treatment programme is a weighted average of mortality among patients lost to follow-up and patients remaining in care. The nomogram gives a correction factor based on the percentage of patients lost to follow-up at a given point in time, and the estimated ratio of mortality between patients lost and not lost to follow-up. The mortality observed among patients retained in care is then multiplied by the correction factor to obtain an estimate of programme-level mortality that takes all deaths into account. A web calculator directly calculates the corrected, programme-level mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We applied the method to 11 ART programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Patients retained in care had a mortality at 1 year of 1.4% to 12.0%; loss to follow-up ranged from 2.8% to 28.7%; and the correction factor from 1.2 to 8.0. The absolute difference between uncorrected and corrected mortality at 1 year ranged from 1.6% to 9.8%, and was above 5% in four programmes. The largest difference in mortality was in a programme with 28.7% of patients lost to follow-up at 1 year. Conclusions The amount of bias in mortality estimates can be large in ART programmes with substantial loss to follow-up. Programmes should routinely report mortality among patients retained in care and the proportion of patients lost. A simple nomogram can then be used to estimate mortality among all patients who started ART, for a range of plausible mortality rates among patients lost to follow-up.

Impact of random and systematic recall errors and selection bias in case--control studies on mobile phone use and brain tumors in adolescents (CEFALO study)

Whether the use of mobile phones is a risk factor for brain tumors in adolescents is currently being studied. Case--control studies investigating this possible relationship are prone to recall error and selection bias. We assessed the potential impact of random and systematic recall error and selection bias on odds ratios (ORs) by performing simulations based on real data from an ongoing case--control study of mobile phones and brain tumor risk in children and adolescents (CEFALO study). Simulations were conducted for two mobile phone exposure categories: regular and heavy use. Our choice of levels of recall error was guided by a validation study that compared objective network operator data with the self-reported amount of mobile phone use in CEFALO. In our validation study, cases overestimated their number of calls by 9% on average and controls by 34%. Cases also overestimated their duration of calls by 52% on average and controls by 163%. The participation rates in CEFALO were 83% for cases and 71% for controls. In a variety of scenarios, the combined impact of recall error and selection bias on the estimated ORs was complex. These simulations are useful for the interpretation of previous case-control studies on brain tumor and mobile phone use in adults as well as for the interpretation of future studies on adolescents.

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the association of inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and lack of blinding with biased estimates of intervention effects varies with the nature of the intervention or outcome. DESIGN: Combined analysis of data from three meta-epidemiological studies based on collections of meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: 146 meta-analyses including 1346 trials examining a wide range of interventions and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratios of odds ratios quantifying the degree of bias associated with inadequate or unclear allocation concealment, and lack of blinding, for trials with different types of intervention and outcome. A ratio of odds ratios <1 implies that inadequately concealed or non-blinded trials exaggerate intervention effect estimates. RESULTS: In trials with subjective outcomes effect estimates were exaggerated when there was inadequate or unclear allocation concealment (ratio of odds ratios 0.69 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.82)) or lack of blinding (0.75 (0.61 to 0.93)). In contrast, there was little evidence of bias in trials with objective outcomes: ratios of odds ratios 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03) for inadequate or unclear allocation concealment and 1.01 (0.92 to 1.10) for lack of blinding. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of drug and non-drug interventions. Except for trials with all cause mortality as the outcome, the magnitude of bias varied between meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The average bias associated with defects in the conduct of randomised trials varies with the type of outcome. Systematic reviewers should routinely assess the risk of bias in the results of trials, and should report meta-analyses restricted to trials at low risk of bias either as the primary analysis or in conjunction with less restrictive analyses.

In search of optimal compression therapy for venous leg ulcers: a meta-analysis of studies comparing diverse [corrected] bandages with specifically designed stockings

OBJECTIVE: In search of an optimal compression therapy for venous leg ulcers, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing compression systems based on stockings (MCS) with divers bandages. METHODS: RCT were retrieved from six sources and reviewed independently. The primary endpoint, completion of healing within a defined time frame, and the secondary endpoints, time to healing, and pain were entered into a meta-analysis using the tools of the Cochrane Collaboration. Additional subjective endpoints were summarized. RESULTS: Eight RCT (published 1985-2008) fulfilled the predefined criteria. Data presentation was adequate and showed moderate heterogeneity. The studies included 692 patients (21-178/study, mean age 61 years, 56% women). Analyzed were 688 ulcerated legs, present for 1 week to 9 years, sizing 1 to 210 cm(2). The observation period ranged from 12 to 78 weeks. Patient and ulcer characteristics were evenly distributed in three studies, favored the stocking groups in four, and the bandage group in one. Data on the pressure exerted by stockings and bandages were reported in seven and two studies, amounting to 31-56 and 27-49 mm Hg, respectively. The proportion of ulcers healed was greater with stockings than with bandages (62.7% vs 46.6%; P < .00001). The average time to healing (seven studies, 535 patients) was 3 weeks shorter with stockings (P = .0002). In no study performed bandages better than MCS. Pain was assessed in three studies (219 patients) revealing an important advantage of stockings (P < .0001). Other subjective parameters and issues of nursing revealed an advantage of MCS as well. CONCLUSIONS: Leg compression with stockings is clearly better than compression with bandages, has a positive impact on pain, and is easier to use.

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol

BACKGROUND The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool has been widely embraced by the systematic review community, but several studies have reported that its reliability is low. We aim to investigate whether training of raters, including objective and standardized instructions on how to assess risk of bias, can improve the reliability of this tool. We describe the methods that will be used in this investigation and present an intensive standardized training package for risk of bias assessment that could be used by contributors to the Cochrane Collaboration and other reviewers. METHODS/DESIGN This is a pilot study. We will first perform a systematic literature review to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that will be used for risk of bias assessment. Using the identified RCTs, we will then do a randomized experiment, where raters will be allocated to two different training schemes: minimal training and intensive standardized training. We will calculate the chance-corrected weighted Kappa with 95% confidence intervals to quantify within- and between-group Kappa agreement for each of the domains of the risk of bias tool. To calculate between-group Kappa agreement, we will use risk of bias assessments from pairs of raters after resolution of disagreements. Between-group Kappa agreement will quantify the agreement between the risk of bias assessment of raters in the training groups and the risk of bias assessment of experienced raters. To compare agreement of raters under different training conditions, we will calculate differences between Kappa values with 95% confidence intervals. DISCUSSION This study will investigate whether the reliability of the risk of bias tool can be improved by training raters using standardized instructions for risk of bias assessment. One group of inexperienced raters will receive intensive training on risk of bias assessment and the other will receive minimal training. By including a control group with minimal training, we will attempt to mimic what many review authors commonly have to do, that is-conduct risk of bias assessment in RCTs without much formal training or standardized instructions. If our results indicate that an intense standardized training does improve the reliability of the RoB tool, our study is likely to help improve the quality of risk of bias assessments, which is a central component of evidence synthesis.

Can eye movements bias memory recall?

A large body of research suggests that when we retrieve visual information from memory, we look back to the location where we encoded these objects. It has been proposed that the oculomotor trace we act out during encoding is stored in long-term memory, along other contents of the episodic representation. If memory recall triggers the eyes to revisit the location where the stimulus was encoded, is there also an effect in the reverse direction? Can eye movements trigger memory recall? In Experiment 1 participants encoded two faces at two different locations on the computer screen. Then, the average face (morph) of these two faces appeared in either of the two encoding locations and participants had to indicate whether it resembles more the first or second face. In Experiment 2 the morph appeared in a new location, but participants had to repeat one of the oculomotor traces that was used during encoding. Participants’ morph perception was influenced both by the location and the eye-movement it was presented with. Our results suggest that eye-movements can bias memory recall, but only in a short-lasting and rather fragile way.

Prior knowledge of the clinical picture does not introduce bias in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin lesions

A common debate among dermatopathologists is that prior knowledge of the clinical picture of melanocytic skin neoplasms may introduce a potential bias in the histopathologic examination. Histologic slides from 99 melanocytic skin neoplasms were circulated among 10 clinical dermatologists, all of them formally trained and board-certified dermatopathologists: 5 dermatopathologists had clinical images available after a 'blind' examination (Group 1); the other 5 had clinical images available before microscopic examination (Group 2). Data from the two groups were compared regarding 'consensus' (a diagnosis in agreement by ≥4 dermatopathologists/group), chance-corrected interobserver agreement (Fleiss' k) and level of diagnostic confidence (LDC: a 1-5 arbitrary scale indicating 'increasing reliability' of any given diagnosis). Compared with Group 1 dermatopathologists, Group 2 achieved a lower number of consensus (84 vs. 90) but a higher k value (0.74 vs. 0.69) and a greater mean LDC value (4.57 vs. 4.32). The same consensus was achieved by the two groups in 81/99 cases. Spitzoid neoplasms were most frequently controversial for both groups. The histopathologic interpretation of melanocytic neoplasms seems to be not biased by the knowledge of the clinical picture before histopathologic examination.