Roux-en-Y drainage of the pancreatic stump decreases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatic resection

Clinically relevant fistula after distal pancreatic resection occurs in 5-30% of patients, prolonging recovery and considerably increasing in-hospital stay and costs. We tested whether routine drainage of the pancreatic stump into a Roux-en-Y limb after distal pancreatic resection decreased the incidence of fistula. From October 2001, data of all patients undergoing pancreatic distal resection were entered in a prospective database. From June 2003 after resection, the main pancreatic duct and the pancreatic stump were oversewn, and in addition, anastomosed into a jejunal Roux-en-Y limb by a single-layer suture (n = 23). A drain was placed near the anastomosis, and all patients received octreotide for 5-7 days postoperatively. The volume of the drained fluid was registered daily, and concentration of amylase was measured and recorded every other day. Patient demographics, hospital stay, pancreatic fistula incidence (> or =30 ml amylase-rich fluid/day on/after postoperative day 10), perioperative morbidity, and follow-up after discharge were compared with our initial series of patients (treated October 2001-May 2003) who underwent oversewing only (n = 20). Indications, patient demographics, blood loss, and tolerance of an oral diet were similar. There were four (20%) pancreatic fistulas in the "oversewn" group and none in the anastomosis group (p < 0.05). Nonsurgical morbidity, in-hospital stay, and follow-up were comparable in both groups.

Distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity

Background: Classical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (cRYGB) is a combined restrictive and slightly malabsorptive operation. Excess-BMI-loss (EBMIL) in cRYGB is ~60%, but is diminished for super obese patients (BMI > 50 kg/m2). We therefore designed a modified, mainly malabsorptive distal RYGB (dRYGB). Methods: We report mid-term results after 77 consecutive dRYGB in which malabsorption is inversely related to the length of the common channel. The common channel was 100–150 cm long depending on preoperative BMI, the biliopancreatic limb was 100 cm long, which left >>250 cm for the alimentary channel. To avoid the potentially dangerous combination of malabsorption with sustained restriction the pouch size was increased to ~50ml and a 25 mm circular stapler was used for the gastro-jejunostomy. Results: 33 open and later on 44 laparoscopic interventions have been performed. Median preoperative BMI was 50.2 kg/m 2. No severe intraoperative complications have been observed and no anastomotic leakage was noted in the postoperative period. 5 patients needed balloon dilation of an anastomotic stricture. 3 marginal ulcers occurred at the gastrojejunostomy. The 54 patients with a follow-up time of over 12 months (median 24 months) showed an overall median BMI-reduction of 17 to an actual median BMI of 31.6 kg/m2, corresponding to a EBMIL of 74.5%. Obesity-related comorbid conditions were significantly reduced or cured. Intermittent diarrhea or steatorrhea in 12 patients was easily treated by pancreatic enzyme supplementation. Conclusion: dRYGB is technically more demanding than cRYGB, but shows excellent results in terms of weight-loss and therefore also in reduction of comorbidity especially in super-obese patients. Measuring all three limb lengths allows for a calibration of the malabsorption. The quality of food-intake being important to (super-) obese patients in terms of quality of life, a less restrictive pouch seems more adapted to them. Lifelong multidisciplinary follow-up is mandatory.

Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients: a reply to the response by Bhoyrul et al

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: We have read the letter by Bhoyrul et al. in response to our recently published article "Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients". We strongly disagree with the content of the letter. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Bhoyrul et al. base their letter mostly on low level evidence such as single-institutional case series (level IV evidence) and expert opinion (level V evidence). Surprisingly, they do not comment on the randomized controlled trial, which clearly favours gastric bypass over gastric banding. CONCLUSION: The letter by Bhoyrul et al. is based on low level evidence and is itself biased, unsubstantiated, and not supported by the current literature.

The Application of Comorbidity Indices to Predict Early Postoperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Nationwide Comparative Analysis of Over 70,000 Cases

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) often have substantial comorbidities, which must be taken into account to appropriately assess expected postoperative outcomes. The Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indices are widely used comorbidity measures, both of which also have revised algorithms based on enhanced ICD-9-CM coding. It is currently unclear which of the existing comorbidity measures best predicts early postoperative outcomes following LRYGB. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, patients 18 years or older undergoing LRYGB for obesity between 2001 and 2008 were identified. Comorbidities were assessed according to the original and enhanced Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indices. Using multivariate logistic regression, the following early postoperative outcomes were assessed: overall postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and conversion to open surgery. Model performance for the four comorbidity indices was assessed and compared using C-statistics and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC). RESULTS: A total of 70,287 patients were included. Mean age was 43.1 years (SD, 10.8), 81.6 % were female and 60.3 % were White. Both the original and enhanced Elixhauser indices modestly outperformed the Charlson/Deyo in predicting the surgical outcomes. All four models had similar C-statistics, but the original Elixhauser index was associated with the smallest AIC for all of the surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The original Elixhauser index is the best predictor of early postoperative outcomes in our cohort of patients undergoing LRYGB. However, differences between the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indices are modest, and each of these indices provides clinically relevant insight for predicting early postoperative outcomes in this high-risk patient population.