Ancient History as a Means of Transforming Colonial India in the Late-Eighteenth and Early-Nineteenth Centuries

This article focuses on the studies and discourses of mostly British scholars of the early colonial period belonging to two schools of thought. It shows how the studies of both schools – European orientalism and utilitarianism – were intricately connected to the political development of the emerging British paramountcy over the South Asian sub-continent, as both were looking for means of establishing and/or strengthening colonial rule. Nevertheless, the debate was not just a continuation of discussions in Europe. Whereas the ideas of the European Enlightenment had some influence, the transformation of the Mughal Empire and especially the idea of a decline of Muslim rule offered ample opportunities for understanding the early history of India either as some sort of “Golden Age,” as the orientalists and their indigenous supporters did, or as something static and degenerate, as the utilitarians did, and from which the population of sub-continent had to be saved by colonial rule and colonial values. Fearing the spread of the ideas of the French Revolution, the first group of British scholars sought to persuade the native elites of South Asia to take the lessons of their past for the future development of their homeland. Just as the classicists back in Europe, these scholars were convinced that large-scale explanations of the past could also teach political and moral lessons for the present although it was important to deal with the distant past in an empirical manner. The utilitarians on the other hand believed that India had to be saved from its own depravity through the English language and Western values, which amounted to nothing less than the modern transformation of the true Classical Age.

Theories of Militancy in Practice: Explanations of Muslim Terrorism in India

This article analyzes the interaction between theories of radicalization and state responses to militancy in India. Focusing on the interpretation of the increased frequency of terrorist attacks in Indian metropolises in the last decade, the article examines the narratives surrounding those classified as terrorists in the context of rising Muslim militancy in the country. Different state agencies operate with different theories about the links between processes of radicalization and terrorist violence. The scenarios of radicalization underlying legislative efforts to prevent terrorism, the construction of motives by the police, and the interpretation of violence by the judiciary all rely on assumptions about radicalization and violence. Such narratives are used to explain terrorism both to security agencies and to the public; they inform the categories and scenarios of prevention. Prevention relies on detection of future deeds, planning, intentions, and even potential intentions. "Detection" of potential intentions relies on assumptions about specific dispositions. Identification of such dispositions in turn relies on the context-specific theories of the causes of militancy. These determine what "characteristics" of individuals or groups indicate potential threats and form the basis for their categorization as "potentially dangerous." The article explores the cultural contexts of theories of radicalization, focusing on how they are framed by societal understandings of the causes of deviance and the relation between the individual and society emerging in contemporary India. It examines the shift in the perception of threat and the categories of "dangerous others" from a focus on role to a focus on ascriptive identity.

Approaching diplomatic and courtly gift-giving in Europe and Mughal India. Shared practices and cultural diversity

This article deals with courtly gift-giving practices in Europe and Mughal India from a comparative and interwoven perspective. Given the historiographical lacunae on Mughal gift-giving, the article presents preliminary observations for further research. Unlike most contributions to this volume, this article understands the notion of diversity in terms of an intercultural diversity that came to the fore in courtly contexts and in diplomatic encounters. My arguments are bifold. On the one hand, European and Mughal rulers and their envoys shared a common ground of diplomatic gift-giving practices that were shaped by an understanding of what was worthy of giving and of the symbolic power of the given objects. On the other hand, courtly gift-giving practices were embedded in different social and cultural environments in Europe and India. By looking at the notion of the ‘gift’ and the social organisation of the Mughal elite, it becomes clear that pīshkash was an idiosyncratic concept in South and Central Asian contexts and that offerings of manṣabdārs to the Mughal emperor had a different character than those of European courtiers to their rulers.

Siege und Niederlagen, Irrtümer und Erkenntnisse nach 30 Jahren Geschlechtergeschichte. Eine Bilanz

Die Geschlechtergeschichte blickt mittlerweile auf eine mehr als fünf Jahrzehnte überspannende Entwicklung zurück. Wenn Geschlechtergeschichte inzwischen auch bis in die Schulbücher und in die Einführungen zum Geschichtsstudium Eingang gefunden hat, nimmt sie im Fach dennoch weiterhin eine ambivalente Position ein: Sie war einerseits an wichtigen theoretischen Entwicklungen maßgeblich beteiligt (Alltagsgeschichte, historische Anthropologie, linguistic turn, cultural turn, postcolonial turn), andererseits haftet ihr bis heute der Ruch der politisch gefärbten und daher tendenziösen und „unsoliden“ Wissenschaft an. Im Panel soll es darum gehen, wichtige Stationen der Entwicklung der Geschlechtergeschichte (von der Frauen- zur Geschlechtergeschichte, von der feministischen zur akademischen Forschung, von der Etablierung zur Kritik der Kategorie Geschlecht, vom Um-Schreiben der Geschichte zur Historiographie der Geschlechtergeschichte usw.) nachzuvollziehen sowie die wichtigsten Erträge der geschlechtergeschichtlichen Forschung zu beleuchten und Felder zu benennen, in denen die geschlechtergeschichtliche Forschung die Geschichtswissenschaft insgesamt beeinflusst und verändert hat. Dies soll in zwei Etappen realisiert werden: Im ersten Panel sollen wichtige Leistungen der Geschlechtergeschichte innerhalb der Geschichtswissenschaft beleuchtet und deren Rezeption innerhalb der pluralisierten geschichtswissenschaftlichen Ansätze diskutiert werden. In einem zweiten Schritt sollen wichtige Entwicklungen innerhalb der Geschlechtergeschichte themen- bzw. problemspezifisch präsentiert und diskutiert werden. Dies soll in Form einer round table-Diskussion erfolgen. Dabei richtet sich der Blick v.a. auf den bundesdeutschen Raum, ohne aber internationale Entwicklungen dabei außer Acht zu lassen.

The Secular State Under Siege: Religion and Politics in Europe and America

Throughout human history, religion and politics have entertained the most intimate of connections as systems of authority regulating individuals and society. While the two have come apart through the process of secularization, secularism is challenged today by the return of public religion. This cogent analysis unravels the nature of the connection, disconnection, and attempted reconnection between religion and politics in the West. In a comparison of Western Europe and North America, Christianity and Islam, Joppke advances far-reaching theoretical, historical, and comparative-political arguments. With respect to theory, it is argued that only a “substantive” concept of religion, as pertaining to the existence of supra-human powers, opens up the possibility of a historical-comparative perspective on religion. At the level of history, secularization is shown to be the distinct outcome of Latin Christianity itself. And at the level of comparative politics, the Christian Right in America which has attacked the “wall of separation” between religion and state and Islam in Europe with the controversial insistence on sharia law and other “illiberal” claims from some quarters are taken to be counterpart incarnations of public religion and challenges to the secular state. This clearly argued, sweeping book will provide an invaluable framework for approaching an array of critical issues at the intersection of religion, law and politics for advanced students and researchers across the social sciences and legal studies, as well as for the interested public.