Penetrability of the inner mucus layer: who is out there?

Large numbers of microorganisms colonise the skin and mucous membranes of animals, with their highest density in the lower gastrointestinal tract. The impact of these microbes on the host can be demonstrated by comparing animals (usually mice) housed under germ-free conditions, or colonised with different compositions of microbes. Inbreeding and embryo manipulation programs have generated a wide variety of mouse strains with a fixed germ-line (isogenic) and hygiene comparisons robustly show remarkably strong interactions between the microbiota and the host, which can be summarised in three axioms. (I) Live microbes are largely confined to their spaces at body surfaces, provided the animal is not suffering from an infection. (II) There is promiscuous molecular exchange throughout the host and its microbiota in both directions [1]. (III) Every host organ system is profoundly shaped by the presence of body surface microbes. It follows that one must draw a line between live microbial and host “spaces” (I) to understand the crosstalk (II and III) at this interesting interface of the host-microbial superorganism. Of course, since microbes can adapt to very different niches, there has to be more than one line. In this issue of EMBO Reports, Johansson and colleagues have studied mucus, which is the main physical frontier for most microbes in the intestinal tract: they report how different non-pathogenic microbiota compositions affect its permeability and the functional protection of the epithelial surface [2].

Microbiota-mediated fine-tuning of the threshold of intestinal inflammasome activation in host-microbial mutualism

The inflammasome is a complex of proteins that controls the activity of caspase-1, pro-IL-1b and pro-IL-18. It acts in inflammatory processes and in pyropoptosis. The lower intestine is densely populated by a community of commensal bacteria that, under healthy conditions, are beneficial to the host. Some evidence suggests that the gut microbiota influences regulation of the inflammasome. Components of inflammasomes have been shown to have a protective function against development of experimental colitis, dependent on IL-18 production. However the precise mechanisms and the role of the inflammasome in maintaining a healthy host-microbial mutualism remains unknown. To address this question, we have performed axenic (GF) and gnotobiotic in vivo experiments to investigate how the inflammasome components mainly at the level of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) are regulated under different hygiene conditions. We have established that gene expression of the inflammasome components NLRC4, NLRP3, NLRP6, NLRP12, caspase-1, ASC and IL-18 do not differ between germ-free and colonised conditions under steady-state. In contrast, induction in IL-18 was observed following infection with the pathobiont Segmented Filamentous Bacteria or the pathogen C. rodentium. Additional preliminar findings suggest that a more diverse intestinal flora, like specific pathogen-free (SPF) flora, is more efficient in inducing basal activation of the inflammasome and especially production of IL-18 by IECs, shortly after colonisation. We are also in the process of testing if basal activation of the inflammasome upon intestinal colonization with commensal bacteria helps to protect the host from potential pathobiont bacteria, like C. rodentium, SFB, Prevotella and TM7.