Pitfalls of practicing cancer epidemiology in resource-limited settings: the case of survival and loss to follow-up after a diagnosis of Kaposi's sarcoma in five countries across sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND Survival after diagnosis is a fundamental concern in cancer epidemiology. In resource-rich settings, ambient clinical databases, municipal data and cancer registries make survival estimation in real-world populations relatively straightforward. In resource-poor settings, given the deficiencies in a variety of health-related data systems, it is less clear how well we can determine cancer survival from ambient data. METHODS We addressed this issue in sub-Saharan Africa for Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), a cancer for which incidence has exploded with the HIV epidemic but for which survival in the region may be changing with the recent advent of antiretroviral therapy (ART). From 33 primary care HIV Clinics in Kenya, Uganda, Malawi, Nigeria and Cameroon participating in the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) Consortia in 2009-2012, we identified 1328 adults with newly diagnosed KS. Patients were evaluated from KS diagnosis until death, transfer to another facility or database closure. RESULTS Nominally, 22% of patients were estimated to be dead by 2 years, but this estimate was clouded by 45% cumulative lost to follow-up with unknown vital status by 2 years. After adjustment for site and CD4 count, age <30 years and male sex were independently associated with becoming lost. CONCLUSIONS In this community-based sample of patients diagnosed with KS in sub-Saharan Africa, almost half became lost to follow-up by 2 years. This precluded accurate estimation of survival. Until we either generally strengthen data systems or implement cancer-specific enhancements (e.g., tracking of the lost) in the region, insights from cancer epidemiology will be limited.

Immune recovery in HIV-infected patients after candida esophagitis is impaired despite long-term antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE Candida esophagitis belongs to the most common AIDS-defining diseases, however, a comprehensive immune pathogenic concept is lacking. DESIGN We investigated the immune status of 37 HIV-1-infected patients from the Swiss HIV cohort study at diagnosis of Candida esophagitis, 1 year before, 1 year later and after 2 years of suppressed HIV RNA. We compared these patients to 3 groups: 37 HIV-1-infected patients without Candida esophagitis but similar CD4 counts as the patients at diagnosis (advanced HIV group), 15 HIV-1-infected patients with CD4 counts >500 cells/μl, CD4 nadir >350 cells/μl and suppressed HIV RNA under combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) (early cART group), and 20 healthy individuals. METHODS We investigated phenotype, cytokine production and proliferative capacity of different immune cells by flow cytometry and ELISpot. RESULTS We found that patients with Candida esophagitis had nearly abolished CD4 proliferation in response to C. albicans, significantly increased percentages of dysfunctional CD4 cells, significantly decreased cytotoxic NK-cell counts and peripheral innate lymphoid cells and significantly reduced IFN-γ and IL-17 production compared to the early cART group and healthy individuals. Most of these defects remained for more than 2 years despite viral suppression. The advanced HIV group without opportunistic infection showed partly improved immune recovery. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that Candida esophagitis in HIV-1-infected patients is caused by an accumulation of multiple, partly Candida-specific immunological defects. Long-term immune recovery is impaired, illustrating that specific immunological gaps persist despite cART. These data also support the rationale for early cART initiation to prevent irreversible immune defects.