Estimating the benefit of a second bone anchored hearing implant in unilaterally implanted users with a testband.

Conclusion Using a second bone anchored hearing implant (BAHI) mounted on a testband in unilaterally implanted BAHI users to test its potential advantage pre-operatively under-estimates the advantage of two BAHIs placed on two implants. Objectives To investigate how well speech understanding with a second BAHI mounted on a testband approaches the benefit of bilaterally implanted BAHIs. Method Prospective study with 16 BAHI users. Eight were implanted unilaterally (group A) and eight were implanted bilaterally (group B). Aided speech understanding was measured. Speech was presented from the front and noise came either from the left, right, or from the front in two conditions for group A (with one BAHI, and with two BAHIs, where the second device was mounted on a testband) and in three conditions for group B (same two conditions as group A, and in addition with both BAHIs mounted on implants). Results Speech understanding in noise improved with the additional device for noise from the side of the first BAHI (+0.7 to +2.1 dB) and decreased for noise from the other side (-1.8 dB to -3.9 dB). Improvements were highest (+2.1 dB, p = 0.016) and disadvantages were smallest (-1.8 dB, p = 0.047) with both BAHIs mounted on implants. Testbands yielded smaller advantages and higher disadvantages of the additional BAHI (average difference = -0.9 dB).

Telomere length increase after weight loss induced by bariatric surgery: results from a 10 years prospective study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Obesity contributes to telomere attrition. Studies focusing on short-term effects of weight loss have been unable to identify protection of telomere length. This study investigates long-term effects of pronounced weight loss induced by bariatric surgery on telomere length. SUBJECTS/METHODS One hundred forty-two patients were recruited in a prospective, controlled intervention study, follow-up investigations were done after 10.46±1.48 years. A control group of normal weight participants was recruited and followed from 1995 to 2005 in the Bruneck Study. A total of 110 participants from each study was matched by age and sex to compare changes in telomere length. Quantitative PCR was used to determine telomere length. RESULTS Telomere length increased significantly by 0.024±0.14 (P=0.047) in 142 bariatric patients within 10 years after surgery. The increase was different from telomere attrition in an age- and sex-matched cohort population of the Bruneck Study (-0.057±0.18; β=0.08; P=0.003). Significant changes in telomere length disappeared after adjusting for baseline body mass index (BMI) because of general differences in BMI and telomere length between the two study populations (β=0.07; P=0.06). Age was proportional to telomere length in matched bariatric patients (r=0.188; P=0.049) but inversely correlated with telomere length in participants of the Bruneck Study (r=-0.197; P=0.039). There was no association between percent BMI/excess weight loss and telomere attrition in bariatric patients. Baseline telomere length in bariatric patients was inversely associated with baseline plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. Telomere shortening was associated with lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and higher fasting glucose concentration at baseline in bariatric patients. CONCLUSIONS Increases in relative telomere length were found after bariatric surgery in the long term, presumably due to amelioration of metabolic traits. This may overrule the influence of age and baseline telomere length and facilitate telomere protection in patients experiencing pronounced weight loss.

High intratumoral levels of FoxP3+ lymphocytes are associated with better prognosis in primary resected esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Background: Tumor infiltrating T-lymphocytes (TILs) have been shown to play an important prognostic role in many carcinomas. The identification of prognostic relevant morphological or molecular factors is a major area of interest in the diagnostic process and for the treatment of highly aggressive esophageal adenocarcinoma. Studies about the impact of TILs in this tumor have not shown completely congruent results yet. We present a comprehensive study about the clinical and pathological impact of TIL in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Methods: A next generation tissue microarray (TMA) of 117 primary resected esophageal adenocarcinomas was analyzed for CD3+, CD8+ and FoxP3+ TIL using immunohistochemistry. The TMA contained three cores of the tumor center and the tumor periphery per each case. Slides were scanned with a high-resolution scanner (ScanScope CS; Aperio) and an image analysis software (Aperio Image Scope) was used to determine the TIL counts. The results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Results: CD3+, CD8+ and FoxP3+ TIL counts showed a significant correlation among each other (p<0.001 each, range: 0.27-0.77). TIL counts were categorized as high and low levels, according to the median. Tumors with high FoxP3+ intratumoral lymphocyte counts were more frequently of lower pT category (p<0.001) and without lymph node metastasis (p=0.04). High levels of FoxP3+ lymphocytes in the tumor center and the periphery were also associated with better prognosis (p<0.001 and p=0.041, respectively) in univariate analysis. A similar prognostic impact was seen for high levels of CD3+ and CD8+ TIL in the tumor center, but not in the periphery (p=0.047 and p=0.011, respectively). In multivariate analysis high central FoxP3+TIL levels were an independent prognostic factor (HR=0.4; p=0.023) which was similar to a combination score of CD3+/CD8+/FoxP3+ TIL (HR=0.54; p=0.027) or CD8+/Foxp3+ TIL (HR=0.052; p=0.020) and superior to pT- and pN category (p>0.05 each). Conclusion: This study demonstrates a significant beneficial prognostic impact of high TIL counts in the tumor center of esophageal adenocarcinomas, in particular with regards to the subpopulation of FoxP3+ and CD8+ T-regulatory cells. The determination of intratumoral lymphocytic counts and application of TIL scores can improve prognostic accuracy of pathologic reports of these tumors and may be helpful for better risk stratification of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized comparison of stem cell transplantation with drug treatment.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent today's treatment of choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is regarded as salvage therapy. This prospective randomized CML-study IIIA recruited 669 patients with newly diagnosed CML between July 1997 and January 2004 from 143 centers. Of these, 427 patients were considered eligible for HSCT and were randomized by availability of a matched family donor between primary HSCT (group A; N=166 patients) and best available drug treatment (group B; N=261). Primary end point was long-term survival. Survival probabilities were not different between groups A and B (10-year survival: 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.82) vs 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61-0.76)), but influenced by disease and transplant risk. Patients with a low transplant risk showed superior survival compared with patients with high- (P<0.001) and non-high-risk disease (P=0.047) in group B; after entering blast crisis, survival was not different with or without HSCT. Significantly more patients in group A were in molecular remission (56% vs 39%; P=0.005) and free of drug treatment (56% vs 6%; P<0.001). Differences in symptoms and Karnofsky score were not significant. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSCT remains a valid option when both disease and transplant risk are considered.Leukemia advance online publication, 20 November 2015; doi:10.1038/leu.2015.281.

Anaesthetic induction with etomidate in cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Etomidate is perceived as preserving haemodynamic stability during induction of anaesthesia. It is also associated with adrenocortical dysfunction. The risk/benefit relationship is controversial. OBJECTIVES We tested the hypotheses that single-dose etomidate increases cumulative vasopressor requirement, time to extubation and length of stay in the ICU. DESIGN Double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, from November 2006 to December 2009. PATIENTS There were 90 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) and 40 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery (MVS). Reasons for noninclusion were known adrenocortical insufficiency, use of etomidate or propofol within 1 week preoperatively, use of glucocorticoids within 6 months preoperatively, severe renal or liver dysfunction, or carotid stenosis. INTERVENTIONS CABG patients were allocated randomly to receive either etomidate 0.15 mg kg with placebo, propofol 1.5 mg kg with placebo or etomidate 0.15 mg kg with hydrocortisone (n = 30 in each arm). Risk stratification (low vs. high) was achieved by block randomisation. MVS patients received either etomidate 0.15 mg kg or propofol 1.5 mg kg (n = 20 in each arm). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cumulative vasopressor requirements, incidence of adrenocortical insufficiency, length of time to extubation and length of stay in ICU. RESULTS Cumulative vasopressor requirements 24 h after induction did not differ between treatments in patients who underwent CABG, whereas more noradrenaline was used in MVS patients following propofol induction (absolute mean difference 5.86 μg kg over 24 h P = 0.047). The incidence of relative adrenocortical insufficiency was higher after etomidate alone than propofol (CABG 83 vs. 37%, P < 0.001; MVS: 95 vs. 35%, P < 0.001). The time to extubation, length of stay in ICU and 30-day mortality did not differ among treatments. Within low and high-risk subgroups, no differences in vasopressor use or outcomes were found. CONCLUSION In elective cardiac surgery, laboratory indicators of etomidate-induced adrenal insufficiency do not translate into increased vasopressor requirement or inferior early outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 00415701.