Microsurgical management of large intra-and extracranial calvarial meningiomas

Objective: Based on the largest series reported of giant intra- and extracranial calvarial meningiomas (GIECM) the purpose of the present study was to characterize the treatment and outcome data associated with patients operated on GIECM and to describe our experience in the management of this rare and therapeutically demanding tumour entity. Methods: The data of 12 patients (7/12 males, 5/12 females) with surgically treated GIECM at the University Hospitals Aachen and Bern between 1994 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean patient age was 58 years (range, 22 to 78 years). Symptom distribution included extracranial swelling (12/12), seizures (5/12), headache (4/12), gait disturbance (3/12), dizziness (2/12), and impaired vision (1/12). GIECM were located frontal (6/12), temporal (3/12), parietal, fronto-parietal, and parieto-occipital (1/12 each). Microsurgical resection with acrylic-augmented cranioplasty was performed in all patients and 11/12 patients received dural repair with synthetic (7/11) or autologous (4/11) patch grafts. Surgical excision in two stages with primary removal of the extracranial meningioma component was undertaken in 2/12 patients, whereas preoperative embolization and postoperative radiotherapy were applied in 1/12 patient each. Results: In contrast to intradural meningiomas GIECM mainly affect male patients at a comparatively younger age. GIECM could be completely (9/12) or subtotally (3/12) resected. Surgical-associated complications included minor CSF leak (6/12), wound healing disturbance (3/12), venous engorgement, and haemorrhage (2/12 each), requiring reoperation in 3/12 cases. Histopathological examination revealed meningothelial (6/12), atypical (4/12), and transitional (1/12) GIECM. 10/12 patients exhibited excellent postoperative clinical outcome, 1/12 patient each deteriorated or died of pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: The operative management of GIECM is challenging, carries a substantial risk, and demands special strategies because of the large tumour size, anatomical involvement of scalp, calvaria, meninges, brain or vascular structures, and more frequent atypical histology. Although microsurgical resection with cranioplasty and mostly dural grafting usually results in a good clinical outcome, the potential complication rate is markedly higher when compared to smaller meningiomas without extracranial component. Preoperative embolization and staging of surgical resection are possible additional therapeutic options.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: a comprehensive review of the CIAO study

The CIAO Study ("Complicated Intra-Abdominal infection Observational" Study) is a multicenter investigation performed in 68 medical institutions throughout Europe over the course of a 6-month observational period (January-June 2012).Patients with either community-acquired or healthcare-associated complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) were included in the study.2,152 patients with a mean age of 53.8 years (range: 4-98 years) were enrolled in the study. 46.3% of the patients were women and 53.7% were men. Intraperitoneal specimens were collected from 62.2% of the enrolled patients, and from these samples, a variety of microorganisms were collectively identified.The overall mortality rate was 7.5% (163/2.152).According to multivariate analysis of the compiled data, several criteria were found to be independent variables predictive of patient mortality, including patient age, the presence of an intestinal non-appendicular source of infection (colonic non-diverticular perforation, complicated diverticulitis, small bowel perforation), a delayed initial intervention (a delay exceeding 24 hours), sepsis and septic shock in the immediate post-operative period, and ICU admission.Given the sweeping geographical distribution of the participating medical centers, the CIAO Study gives an accurate description of the epidemiological, clinical, microbiological, and treatment profiles of complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) throughout Europe.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: preliminary data from the first three months of the CIAO Study

The CIAO Study is a multicenter observational study currently underway in 66 European medical institutions over the course of a six-month study period (January-June 2012).This preliminary report overviews the findings of the first half of the study, which includes all data from the first three months of the six-month study period.Patients with either community-acquired or healthcare-associated complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) were included in the study.912 patients with a mean age of 54.4 years (range 4-98) were enrolled in the study during the first three-month period. 47.7% of the patients were women and 52.3% were men. Among these patients, 83.3% were affected by community-acquired IAIs while the remaining 16.7% presented with healthcare-associated infections. Intraperitoneal specimens were collected from 64.2% of the enrolled patients, and from these samples, 825 microorganisms were collectively identified.The overall mortality rate was 6.4% (58/912). According to univariate statistical analysis of the data, critical clinical condition of the patient upon hospital admission (defined by severe sepsis and septic shock) as well as healthcare-associated infections, non-appendicular origin, generalized peritonitis, and serious comorbidities such as malignancy and severe cardiovascular disease were all significant risk factors for patient mortality.White Blood Cell counts (WBCs) greater than 12,000 or less than 4,000 and core body temperatures exceeding 38°C or less than 36°C by the third post-operative day were statistically significant indicators of patient mortality.

Interrelation of peri-operative morbidity and ASA class assignment in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate intra- and post-operative risk using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification which is an important predictor of an intervention and of the entire operating programme. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study, 4435 consecutive patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery at the Gynaecological Clinic of the University Hospital of Zurich were included. The ASA classification for pre-operative risk assessment was determined by an anaesthesiologist after a thorough physical examination. We observed several pre-, intra- and post-operative parameters, such as age, body-mass-index, duration of anaesthesia, duration of surgery, blood loss, duration of post-operative stay, complicated post-operative course, morbidity and mortality. The investigation of different risk factors was achieved by a multiple linear regression model for log-transformed duration of hospitalisation. RESULTS: Age and obesity were responsible for a higher ASA classification. ASA grade correlates with the duration of anaesthesia and the duration of the surgery itself. There was a significant difference in blood loss between ASA grades I (113+/-195 ml) and III (222+/-470 ml) and between classes II (176+/-432 ml) and III. The duration of post-operative hospitalisation could also be correlated with ASA class. ASA class I=1.7+/-3.0 days, ASA class II=3.6+/-4.3 days, ASA class III=6.8+/-8.2 days, and ASA class IV=6.2+/-3.9 days. The mean post-operative in-hospital stay was 2.5+/-4.0 days without complications, and 8.7+/-6.7 days with post-operative complications. Multiple linear regression model showed that not only the ASA classification contained an important information for the duration of hospitalisation. Parameters such as age, class of diagnosis, post-operative complications, etc. also have an influence on the duration of hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the ASA classification can be used as a good and early available predictor for the planning of an intervention in gynaecological surgery. The ASA classification helps the surgeon to assess the peri-operative risk profile of which important information can be derived for the planning of the operation programme.

Peri-operative adrenocortical response to low-dose (1 microg) ACTH and relation to postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that reduced responsiveness to adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) stimulation before elective major abdominal surgery is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications. METHODS: A low-dose (1 microg) ACTH test was performed the day before surgery, during the operation, on the first postoperative day, and before discharge from the hospital in 77 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (age 62 [47;69] yrs [median, quartiles]; 30 female). Thirty-one patients undergoing minor, non-abdominal surgery (mostly inguinal hernia repair) (age 57 [40;66] yrs; 14 female) served as controls with minor surgical stress. A stimulated plasma cortisol concentration >or=500 nmol/l or an increment of >or=200 nmol/l in response to 1 microg ACTH was defined as normal. Scores for surgical stress and comprehensive risk, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were assessed. RESULTS: On the day before major abdominal surgery, basal and stimulated plasma cortisol were 242 (165;299) nmol/l and 497 (404;568) nmol/l, respectively. Eighteen (23%) patients had an abnormal ACTH test, and 7 of these (39%) had complications versus 25 (42%) of the 59 patients with normal ACTH tests (P = .992). Surgical stress, comprehensive risk, and intra- and postoperative basal cortisol levels were higher and the response to ACTH stimulation smaller in patients with major abdominal compared to minor surgery. The peri-operative course of ACTH responses was not associated with complications or LOS in abdominal surgery patients. CONCLUSION: In patients scheduled for abdominal surgery, pre-operatively reduced adrenal response to stimulation with 1 microg ACTH is common but not associated with postoperative complications.