Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity

Early radiographic detection of femoroacetabular impingement might prevent initiation and progression of osteoarthritis. The structural abnormality in femoral-induced femoroacetabular impingement (cam type) is frequently asphericity at the anterosuperior head/neck contour. To determine which of six radiographic projections (anteroposterior, Dunn, Dunn/45 degrees flexion, cross-table/15 degrees internal rotation, cross-table/neutral rotation, and cross-table/15 degrees external rotation) best identifies femoral head/neck asphericity, we studied 21 desiccated femurs; 11 with an aspherical femoral head/neck contour and 10 with a spherical femoral head/neck contour. To radiographically quantify femoral head asphericity, we measured the angle where the femoral head/neck leaves sphericity (angle alpha). The aspherical femoral head/neck contours had a greater maximum angle alpha (70 degrees ) compared with the spherical head/neck contours (50 degrees ). The angle alpha varied depending on the radiographic projection: it was greatest in the Dunn view with 45 degrees hip flexion (71 degrees +/- 10 degrees ) and least in the cross-table view in 15 degrees external rotation (51 degrees +/- 7 degrees ). Diagnosis of a pathologic femoral head/neck contour depends on the radiologic projection. The Dunn view in 45 degrees or 90 degrees flexion or a cross-table projection in internal rotation best show femoral head/neck asphericity, whereas anteroposterior or externally rotated cross-table views are likely to miss asphericity. Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, level II-1 (retrospective study).

Internet based multicenter study for thoracolumbar injuries: a new concept and preliminary results

This article reports about the internet based, second multicenter study (MCS II) of the spine study group (AG WS) of the German trauma association (DGU). It represents a continuation of the first study conducted between the years 1994 and 1996 (MCS I). For the purpose of one common, centralised data capture methodology, a newly developed internet-based data collection system ( http://www.memdoc.org ) of the Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery of the University of Bern was used. The aim of this first publication on the MCS II was to describe in detail the new method of data collection and the structure of the developed data base system, via internet. The goal of the study was the assessment of the current state of treatment for fresh traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar spine in the German speaking part of Europe. For that reason, we intended to collect large number of cases and representative, valid information about the radiographic, clinical and subjective treatment outcomes. Thanks to the new study design of MCS II, not only the common surgical treatment concepts, but also the new and constantly broadening spectrum of spine surgery, i.e. vertebro-/kyphoplasty, computer assisted surgery and navigation, minimal-invasive, and endoscopic techniques, documented and evaluated. We present a first statistical overview and preliminary analysis of 18 centers from Germany and Austria that participated in MCS II. A real time data capture at source was made possible by the constant availability of the data collection system via internet access. Following the principle of an application service provider, software, questionnaires and validation routines are located on a central server, which is accessed from the periphery (hospitals) by means of standard Internet browsers. By that, costly and time consuming software installation and maintenance of local data repositories are avoided and, more importantly, cumbersome migration of data into one integrated database becomes obsolete. Finally, this set-up also replaces traditional systems wherein paper questionnaires were mailed to the central study office and entered by hand whereby incomplete or incorrect forms always represent a resource consuming problem and source of error. With the new study concept and the expanded inclusion criteria of MCS II 1, 251 case histories with admission and surgical data were collected. This remarkable number of interventions documented during 24 months represents an increase of 183% compared to the previously conducted MCS I. The concept and technical feasibility of the MEMdoc data collection system was proven, as the participants of the MCS II succeeded in collecting data ever published on the largest series of patients with spinal injuries treated within a 2 year period.

Sensitivity of osteoblasts, fibroblasts, bone marrow cells, and dendritic cells to 5-aminolevulinic acid based photodynamic therapy

INTRODUCTION: Photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA-PDT) exerts cell type specific effects on target cells. Since chondrocytes were found to be more resistant than osteoblasts to 5-ALA-PDT, the pre-treatment of osteochondral grafts with 5-ALA-PDT may represent a means to devitalize the osseous portion while maintaining functional cartilage. The present study was designed to determine the effects of 5-ALA-PDT in vitro on cell populations residing in skeletal tissues. METHODS: Osteoblasts, fibroblasts, bone marrow cells, and dendritic cells were incubated with 0.5 mM 5-ALA for 4 h. Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) accumulation and after exposure to light cellular functions were assessed for up to 6 days. RESULTS: Accumulation of PpIX reached a plateau at 0.5 mM in osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and dendritic cells, and at 2.0 mM in bone marrow cells. At 0.5 mM 5-ALA, similar responses to illumination were observed in all cells with a survival rate of less than 12% at a light dose of 20 J/cm(2). The function of osteoblasts (proliferation, levels of mRNA encoding collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase activity) and fibroblasts (proliferation, levels of mRNAs encoding collagens type I and III) was not affected, when the cells were treated with 5-ALA and light doses of < or =10 J/cm(2). Paralleling the reduction of viable cells after 5-ALA-PDT, the capacity of dendritic cells to stimulate T cells in a mixed leukocyte reaction decreased to 4+/-2% at 20 J/cm(2). CONCLUSION: The investigated cell types were sensitive to 5-ALA-PDT and the residual cell debris did not elicit an allogenic response. These findings, together with the resistance of chondrocytes to 5-ALA-PDT, encourage the further investigation of this protocol in the pretreatment of osteochondral allografts.

Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign"

Acetabular retroversion has been proposed to contribute to the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. For the diagnosis of this condition, conventional AP pelvic radiographs may represent a reliable, easily available diagnostic modality as they can be obtained with a reproducible technique allowing the anterior and posterior acetabular rims to be visible for assessment. This study was designed to: (i) determine cranial, central, and caudal anatomic acetabular version (AV) from cadaveric specimens; (ii) establish the validity and reliability of the radiographic measurements of central acetabular anteversion; and (iii) determine the validity and reliability of the radiographic "cross-over-sign" to detect acetabular retroversion. Using 43 desiccated pelvises (86 acetabuli) the anatomic AVs were measured at three different transverse planes (cranially, centrally, and caudally). From these pelvises, standardized AP pelvic radiographs were obtained. To directly measure central AV, a modified radiographic method is introduced for the use of AP pelvic radiographs. The validity and reliability of this radiographic method and of the radiographic cross-over-sign to detect cranial acetabular retroversion were determined. The mean central and caudal anatomic AVs were approximately 20 degrees , and the mean cranial AV was 8 degrees . Cranial retroversion (AV < 0 degrees ) was present in 19 of 86 hips (22%). A linear correlation was found between the central and cranial AV. Below 10 degrees of central AV, all acetabuli were cranially retroverted. Between 10 degrees and 20 degrees , 30% of the acetabuli were cranially retroverted, and above 20 degrees , only 1 of 45 acetabuli was cranially retroverted. The radiographic measurement of the central AV (20.3 +/- 6.5 degrees ) correlated strongly with the anatomic AV (20.1 +/- 6.4 degrees ). The sensitivity of the cross-over-sign to detect a cranial acetabular anteversion of less than 4 degrees was 96%, its specificity 95%, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values 90% and 98%, respectively. Both the modified radiographic anteversion measurements and the cross-over-sign demonstrated substantial inter- and intraobserver reliability. Retroversion is almost exclusively a problem of the cranial acetabulum. The cranial AV is on average 12 degrees lower than the central AV, with the latter directly measurable from AP pelvic radiographs. A central AV of less than 10 degrees was associated with cranial retroversion. The presence of a positive cross-over-sign is a highly reliable indicator of cranial AV of <4 degrees.

Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. Surgical technique

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in the understanding of the anatomy and function of the acetabular labrum suggest that it is important for normal joint function. We found no available data regarding whether labral refixation after treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement affects the clinical and radiographic results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of fifty-two patients (sixty hips) with femoro-acetabular impingement who underwent arthrotomy and surgical dislocation of the hip to allow trimming of the acetabular rim and femoral osteochondroplasty. In the first twenty-five hips, the torn labrum was resected (Group 1); in the next thirty-five hips, the intact portion of the labrum was reattached to the acetabular rim (Group 2). At one and two years postoperatively, the Merle d'Aubigné clinical score and the Tönnis arthrosis classification system were used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: At one year postoperatively, both groups showed a significant improvement in their clinical scores (mainly pain reduction) compared with their preoperative values (p = 0.0003 for Group 1 and p < 0.0001 for Group 2). At two years postoperatively, 28% of the hips in Group 1 (labral resection) had an excellent result, 48% had a good result, 20% had a moderate result, and 4% had a poor result. In contrast, in Group 2 (labral reattachment), 80% of the hips had an excellent result, 14% had a good result, and 6% had a moderate result. Comparison of the clinical scores between the two groups revealed significantly better outcomes for Group 2 at one year (p = 0.0001) and at two years (p = 0.01). Radiographic signs of osteoarthritis were significantly more prevalent in Group 1 than in Group 2 at one year (p = 0.02) and at two years (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with labral refixation recovered earlier and had superior clinical and radiographic results when compared with patients who had undergone resection of a torn labrum. Although the results must be considered preliminary, we now recommend refixation of the intact portion of the labrum after trimming of the acetabular rim during surgical treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement.