Transregional Interactions between Jansenists, other Catholics, and Protestants in Seventeenth Century Northern Europe

This paper discusses the theological and cultural exchanges between Catholic clergy and theologians, and specifically between the neo-Augustinian-minded, the so-called “Jansenists”, and other Catholics, in Northern Europe during the seventeenth century. It also explores the Jansenists’ encounters and theological engagement with Protestantism. In this period, interaction and transfer between French Jansenist Catholics and other Catholics in other countries took place in various ways: 1. Via traveling and migration: French theologians and clergy returned home from their travels with reports about the situation of Catholicism and Protestantism in other countries; moreover, in the second half of the 17th century, French Jansenists fled to the northern Netherlands. 2. Via networking: it is little known that for a brief period on the North Sea island of Nordstrand, adherents to Port-Royal were buying land, and clergy of the Flemish Oratory provided pastoral care for the island’s Catholics. This project was not successful, but at the end it strengthened the network between French “Jansenists” and Catholics in the Dutch Republic. 3. Via publications by leading Jansenists and their counterparts. In this paper, the focus is on the view of Protestantism held by Jansenist writers.

Ein Tag mit Bernhard von Clairvaux

Bernhard von Clairvaux (1190-1153) ist der wohl bekannteste Zisterzienser. Mit seinen Schriften, Predigten und Briefen gewann er einen grossen Einfluss im Abendland. Bernhard hielt sich mehrmals in der Schweiz auf, auch in der Nordschweiz (Basel, Konstanz, Schaffhausen, Zürich). Bernhards Texte wurden an vielen Orten gelesen, wohl auch in Olsberg, als es noch ein Kloster war. Der „Tag mit Bernhard von Clairvaux“ beginnt mit einer Einführung in Leben und Werk Bernhards. Anschliessend werden einige seiner Predigten zum Hohelied der Liebe gelesen und besprochen. Welche Spiritualität spricht aus ihnen? Was können heutige Leserinnen und Leser mit diesen Texten anfangen, sind sie brauchbar für heutige Lebensfragen oder rein historische Zeugnisse? Der Tag wird mit einem gemeinsamen Abendgebet in der ehemaligen Klosterkirche Olsberg abgeschlossen.

Katholisch, nicht ultramontan. Das altkatholische Engagement für die Entstehung einer katholischen Internationale

Die altkatholische Bewegung war von Anfang an international. Dies zeigt nicht nur die Präsenz von Anglikanern, Orthodoxen u.a. bei den ersten Kongressen der Altkatholiken ab 1871, sondern auch das Korrespondenznetzwerk führender Altkatholiken und die Initiativen für die „Wiedervereinigung der Kirchen“, wie sie u.a. Gestalt annahmen in den „Bonner Unionskonferenzen“ von 1874/75 und in der Gestaltung der Beziehungen zu Anglikanern und Orthodoxen danach. Im Vortrag wird aufgezeigt, wie im frühen Altkatholizismus Kontakte geknüpft wurden zur Römisch-Katholischen Kirche der Altbischöflichen Klerisei in den Niederlanden und zu den armenischen Katholiken, die in der altkatholischen Presse als „Altkatholiken“ bezeichnet wurden. „Altkatholisch“ bezeichnete damals eine bestimmte Gesinnung und Richtung innerhalb des westlichen Katholizismus, in der der Widerstand gegen die vatikanischen Papstdogmen aber auch das Anliegen kirchlicher Reform eine wichtige Rolle spielten. Der Vortrag gibtl einen Überblick darüber, wie und auf welcher Grundlage diese Kontakte vertieft bzw. lockerer wurden, und wie in den Folgejahrzehnten Beziehungen zu weiteren katholischen Gruppen in anderen Ländern geknüpft wurden. Die Formierung einer katholischen Internationale von katholischen Kirchen und Gruppen, die nicht ultramontan waren und nicht mit Rom in Gemeinschaft standen, war dabei der Ausdruck von Anliegen, die im Kern theologischer, ekklesiologischer und ökumenischer Natur waren (Reform der Kirche, Wiedervereinigung der Kirchen, „altkirchliche Ökumene“). Das Eintreten für diese Form des Katholizismus war bis ins 20. Jahrhundert mit starker anti-ultramontaner und anti-römischer Polemik verbunden.

The Role of the European Imperial Powers throughout the Armenian Schism in the 1870s

The Bull "Reversurus" (1867) and its dogmatic legitimization at the First Vatican Council in 1870 caused not only ecclesiastical controversy and Schism in the Armenian Catholic Church, but it had also wide political consequences for the Armenian Catholics in the Ottoman Empire. The conflict originally between the Armenian Catholics and Rome attracted very soon the attention of the European imperial Powers. France, the British Empire, the German Empire, Austria-Hungary and Russia were the main political powers who were involved in the Armenian affair. A full picture of the role of all these powers for the course of the Armenian Schism is missing. Mostly the role of France is foregrounded in the printed sources, as the main power, which supported the papacy to win during the Armenian affair. The role and the motives of the other imperial powers is almost missing. This article will try to describe as completely as possible the historical and political background, which brought to the escalation of the Armenian conflict beyond the national frontiers and led to number of conflicts at the international and transnational level. It will be shown that the imperial policy in Europe in the 19th century have played an enormous role throughout the Armenian Schism. It will be explained that several historical circumstances in Europe, especially the relation of the European imperial powers to each other as well as their expectations from the Ottoman Empire and its Armenian subjects were decisive for the duration and conclusion of the Armenian Schism.

Islamophobia as Reactive Co-Radicalization

Since 9/11, 2001, a new form of religious extremism has arguably emerged, one which paradoxically portrays itself as a counter to another perceived extremism regarded as a real and imminent threat. Within North America and Western Europe, as elsewhere, there is an upsurge of various forms of reactionary rhetoric and opposition expressed towards Islam and Muslims. An increase in extremist behaviour, even violence, is appearing from quarters opposed to, or varyingly fearful of, Islamic extremism if not Islam or Muslims. Islamophobia, as a manifestation of fear of an exclusionary Islam, manifests as exclusionary or negatively reactive behaviours with Muslims and Islam as the target. This article explores the idea that Islamophobia can be regarded as a manifestation of religious extremism and, further, that such extremism is construable as “reactive co-radicalization.” It focuses on two European cases – the 2009 Swiss ban on the building of minarets and the 2011 Norwegian massacre carried out by Anders Breivik – as examples of this “reactive co-radicalization.” This term, I suggest, is an apt denominator for the exclusionary reaction to the rising presence of Islam within otherwise secular, albeit nominally Christian, Western European and North American societies, among others.

Reactive Co-Radicalization: Religious Extremism as Mutual Dicontent

Extremist rhetoric and behaviour, including violence, emanating from those fearing and opposed to Islamic extremism—and typically generalising that to Islam or Muslims—is undeniable. Equally, there is evidence of Muslim rhetoric that fires up fears of a threatening West and antipathy to religious ‘others’ as damned infidels, including Christians and Jews who are otherwise regarded as co-religionists—as ‘peoples of the Book’. Mutual discontent and antipathy abound. On the one hand, Islamic extremism provokes a reactionary extremism from parts, at least, of the non-Muslim world; on the other hand, Muslim extremism appears often in response to the perception of an aggressive and impositional colonising non-Muslim world. ‘Reactive Co-Radicalization’, I suggest, names this mutual rejection and exclusionary circle currently evident, in particular, with respect to many Muslim and non-Muslim communities. This article discusses reactive co-radicalization as a hermeneutical perspective on religious extremism with particular reference to two European cases.