Proenkephalin as marker for severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study

Objective: Several biomarker have shown associations with severity, vasospasm, ischemic events or outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Yet no biomarker is used in daily clinical routine. Previously encephalin peptides were described as new biomarkers in ischemic stroke and traumatic brain injury. We sought to evaluate the usefulness of Proenkephalin A, a precursor protein of encephalin peptides, as biomarker in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Method: Eighteen consecutive patients with aSAH had plasma PENK A levels measured with a validated chemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay. The association of PENK A levels at admission with severity of SAH according to the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade after resuscitation was the primary endpoint. Levels of PENK A are analyzed with respect to different clinical and radiological scores as well as between patients with ICH, intraventricular hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, brain edema, vasospasm and ischemia. Results: Good grade patients showed median PENK A levels of 73.9pmol/l (IQR 69-80.4) and poor grade patients 117pmol/l (IQR 86-149). PENK A levels are significantly associated with severity of SAH as graded on the WFNS scale (p=0.03). No other parameter had a significant association. Conclusions: PENK A might be a useful serum marker in aSAH. Yet, larger trials also with serial PENK A assessments are needed.

Clinical herniation – how to improve differentiation between WFNS grade IV and V

Objective: Current data show a favorable outcome after poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in up to 50% of patients. This limits the use of the WFNS scale for drawing treatment decisions. We therefore analyzed how clinical signs of herniation might improve the existing WFNS grading. Therefore we compared the current WFNS grading and a modified WFNS grading with respect to outcome. Method: We performed a retrospective study including 182 poor grade SAH patients. Patients were graded according to the original WFNS scale and additionally into a modified classification the “WFNS herniation” (WFNSh grade IV: no herniation; grade V clinical signs of herniation). Outcome was compared between these two grading systems with respect to the dichotomized modified Rankin scale after 6 months. Results: The WFNS and WFNSh showed a positive predictive value (PPV) for poor outcome of 74.3% (OR 3.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.94, 7.54) and 85.7% (OR 8.27, 95% CI=3.78, 19.47), respectively. With respect to mortality the PPV was 68.3% (OR 3.9, 95% CI=2.01, 7.69) for the WFNS grade V and 77.9% (OR 6.22, 95% CI=3.07, 13.14) for the WFNSh grade V. Conclusions: Using positive clinical signs of herniation instead of “no response to pain stimuli” (motor Glasgow Coma Scale Score) can improve WFNS V grading. Using this modification, prediction of poor outcome or death improves.