Immediate bacterial colonization of titanium implants

Background: The information on bacterial colonization immediately after dental implant insertion is limited. Aims: (1) to assess the early colonization on titanium implants immediately post placement through the first12 post-surgical weeks , (2) to compare the microflora at interproximal subgingival implant and adjacent tooth sites. Material and Methods: Subgingival plaque samples from implant and neighbouring teeth were studied by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization before, 30 min. after implant placement , 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weerks after surgery. Results: Comparing bacterial loads at implant sites between 30 min. after placement with one week data showed that only the levels of V.parvula (p<0.05) differed with higher loads at week 1. Week 12 data demonstrated significantly higher bacterial loads for 15/40 species at tooth sites compared to pre-surgery (p < values varying between 0.05 and 0.01). Between immediately post-surgery and week 12 at implant sites 29/40 species were more commonly found at week 12. Included among these bacteria at implant sites were P.gingivalis (p< 0.05), T.forsythia, (p < 0.01), and T denticola (p<0.001). Immediately post-surgery 5.9% of implants, and 26.2% of teeth and at week 12, 15.0 % of implants, and 39.1% of teeth harbored S.aureus. Comparing tooth and implant sites, significantly higher bacterial loads were found at tooth sites for 27/40 species at the 30 minutes after placement interval. This difference increased to 35/40 species at week 12. Conclusions: The colonization of bacteria occurs within 30 minutes. Colonization patterns differed between implants and tooth surfaces.

Tooth loss over five years

Objectives: To assess the ability to predict tooth loss on the basis of clinical and radiographic parameters. Methods: Clinical and radiographic data from a five year prospective cohort were studied to identify cause of progressive tooth loss in older subjects. Results: 363 subjects with a baseline mean age of 67.1 years (S.D. + 4.7, range : 60-75), and 51.4% women were studied including 59.5% never smokers, and 33.0% current smokers. At baseline the subjects had, on average, 22.4 teeth (S.D. + 6.4). Self-assessed tooth loss risk was identified by 16.0 % of subjects while 34% of subjects lost teeth. Tooth loss due to caries was found in 24.7% (178 teeth), periodontitis in 15.4% (133 teeth), peri-apical lesions 5.9% (32 teeth), combined periodontal/peri-apical in 3.4% (18 teeth), and teeth irrational to treat in 7.5% (58 teeth) of the subjects. 122 of the extracted teeth (34%) should have been possible to save but were extracted. At year five severe caries, periodontitis, peri-apical lesions, periodontal/peri-apical, irrational to treat were found in 6.3%, 7.2%, 2.6%, 4.6%, and 1.2% of subjects, respectively. Signs of osteoporosis increased by 11.2 % (Klemetti index). Linear regression analysis failed to include smoking habits as being explanatory. Explanatory factors were researcher prediction of extraction needs, subject self assessment of risk and change in ostoporosis status (r2 = 0.39, ANOVA, F=22.6, p< 0.001). Conclusions: Caries and periodontitis are primary causes for extraction. Progressive osteoporosis is associated with tooth loss. Radiographs, and subjects self-assessment of risk for tooth loss are robust predictors.

Infection at titanium implants with or without clinical inflammation

Objectives: The aims of the present study were (1)to assess the microbiota at implants in function diagnosed as having either peri-implantitis, or mucositis, or being clinically without symptoms of inflammation, (2) to identify explanatory factors to implant status. Material and Methods: Clinical and microbiological data were collected from 138 subjects (mean age: 62.3 ± 14.9) with 524 implants in function for an average of 10.8 years (S.D. +1.5). The checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method was used to identify 40 bacterial species. Results: Subjects had poor oral hygiene with a mean % plaque score 53.2 ± 24.4. In 36% of cases periodontitis was reported as the cause for implant therapy. Mucositis was diagnosed in 61.6% and per-implantitis in 15.9% of all cases. Edentulous subjects had at implants with peri-implantitis significantly higher bacterial loads for Streptococcus sanguis (p<0.01), Fusobacterium nucleatum sp. nucleatum (p<0.02), and Leptothrichia buccalis (p<0.05) than did dentate implant subjects. Dentate subjects had higher bacterial loads of Porphyromonas gingivalis (p<0.02). The levels of Fusobacterium nucleatum sp.vincentii and Capnocytophaga ochracea were explanatory to mucositis. Only a history of periodontitis as cause of tooth loss and smoking were explanatory to peri-implantitis. The microbiota was not affect by supportive care patterns. Conclusions: Presence or absence of teeth partly explains the implant microbiota. A past history of periodontitis and smoking are associated with peri-implantitis. The microbiota at implants with mucositis, or peri-implantitis is similar to that of teeth. Supportive periodontal and implant therapy fails to have an impact on implant microbiota and does not prevent mucositis and peri-implantitis.