Characterization of the first FGFRL1 mutation identified in a craniosynostosis patient

Fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1 (FGFRL1) is a recently discovered transmembrane protein whose functions remain unclear. Since mutations in the related receptors FGFR1-3 cause skeletal malformations, DNA samples from 55 patients suffering from congenital skeletal malformations and 109 controls were searched for mutations in FGFRL1. One patient was identified harboring a frameshift mutation in the intracellular domain of this novel receptor. The patient showed craniosynostosis, radio-ulnar synostosis and genital abnormalities and had previously been diagnosed with Antley-Bixler syndrome. The effect of the FGFRL1 mutation was studied in vitro. In a reporter gene assay, the wild-type as well as the mutant receptor inhibited FGF signaling. However, the mutant protein differed from the wild-type protein in its subcellular localization. Mutant FGFRL1 was mainly found at the plasma membrane where it interacted with FGF ligands, while the wild-type protein was preferentially located in vesicular structures and the Golgi complex. Two motifs from the intracellular domain of FGFRL1 appeared to be responsible for this differential distribution, a tandem tyrosine based motif and a histidine-rich sequence. Deletion of either one led to the preferential redistribution of FGFRL1 to the plasma membrane. It is therefore likely that mutant FGFRL1 contributes to the skeletal malformations of the patient.

“Delendum est Imperium Ottomanorum“: War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity and the End of the Ottoman Empire

The Ottoman Empire’s status as a full member of the international community of civilized states, which was bound by the rules of international law, had been challenged again and again during the formative period of the international law in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. When the First World War began, it was the first global military conflict, in which these rules of international law were put to the test. In the case of the Ottoman Empire quite a few questions were not yet settled, not least because the country was still bound by unequal treaties and because it had never ratified the renewed Hague Rules of Land Warfare of 1907, which it had only signed under reservations. Against this background the contribution will therefore focus on the debate amongst legal scholars on violations of the laws of war (and humanity) in regard to the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.