Complex syntax in autistic spectrum disorders: A study with relative clauses

Background The few studies that have evaluated syntax in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have yielded conflicting findings: some suggest that once matched on mental age, ASD and typically developing controls do not differ for grammar, while others report that morphosyntactic deficits are independent of cognitive skills in ASD. There is a need for a better understanding of syntax in ASD and its relation to, or dissociation from, nonverbal abilities. Aims Syntax in ASD was assessed by evaluating subject and object relative clause comprehension in adolescents and adults diagnosed with ASD with a performance IQ within the normal range, and with or without a history of language delay. Methods & Procedures Twenty-eight participants with ASD (mean age 21.8) and 28 age-matched controls (mean age 22.07) were required to point to a character designated by relative clauses that varied in syntactic complexity. Outcomes & Results Scores indicate that participants with ASD regardless of the language development history perform significantly worse than age-matched controls with object relative clauses. In addition, participants with ASD with a history of language delay (diagnosed with high-functioning autism in the DSM-IV-TR) perform worse on subject relatives than ASD participants without language delay (diagnosed with Asperger syndrome in the DSM-IV-TR), suggesting that these two groups do not have equivalent linguistic abilities. Performance IQ has a positive impact on the success of the task for the population with ASD. Conclusions & Implications This study reveals subtle grammatical difficulties remaining in adult individuals with ASD within normal IQ range as compared with age-matched peers. Even in the absence of a history of language delay in childhood, the results suggest that a slight deficit may nevertheless be present and go undetected by standardized language assessments. Both groups with and without language delay have a similar global performance on relative clause comprehension; however, the study also indicates that the participants with reported language delay show more difficulty with subject relatives than the participants without language delay, suggesting the presence of differences in linguistic abilities between these subgroups of ASD.

Der WHO Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) als Depressivitätsmaß

Der WHO-5 erfasst mit fünf Items psychisches Wohlbefinden, er dient auch als Screeninginstrument zur Erfassung depressiver Symptomatik. Wenige Studien untersuchten diesen Validitätsaspekt jedoch im klinischen Kontext. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, die Messinvarianz des WHO-5 zwischen depressiven und nicht-depressiven Stichproben sowie Art und Spezifität des Zusammenhangs mit Skalen zur Erfassung der Depressionsschwere zu überprüfen. Insgesamt 414 Personen füllten den WHO-5 und das BDI-II aus. Aktuell erfüllten 207 Personen die DSM-IV-Kriterien einer Major Depression (SKID-I). Eine Teilstichprobe erhielt zusätzlich das Beck-Anxiety-Inventory (BAI) und wurde auf der Hamilton-Depression-Rating-Scale (HAM-D) und der Hamilton- Anxiety-Rating-Scale (HAM-A) durch trainierte Rater eingeschätzt. Der WHO-5 wies hohe Messinvarianz bezüglich des Vorliegens/Nichtvorliegens einer Major Depression auf. Er zeigte hohe negative Zusammenhänge mit selbst- und fremdeingeschätzter Depressivität (BDI-II, HAM-D), insbesondere bei milderer und moderater Symptomschwere und auch nach Kontrolle gleichzeitig bestehender Angstsymptomatik. Diese Ergebnisse unterstützen die Verwendung des WHO-5 als Depressionsmaß, zumindest im Bereich milder und mittlerer Depressionsschwere.