Das Schulhaus als geheimer Miterzieher. Normative Debatten in der Schweiz von 1830 bis 1930

Der Schulhausbau ist im 19. Jahrhundert einem starken Wandel unterworfen. In diesem Buch wird erstmals der Frage nachgegangen, wie und weshalb Normen für den Schulhausbau in der Schweiz von 1830 bis 1930 generiert und in formale Regelungen umgesetzt werden. Die Annahme, Erneuerungen im Schulhausbau betreffend Hygiene, Ergonomie, Ästhetik und Pädagogik hätten erst seit der Wende zum 20. Jahrhundert, insbesondere unter dem Einfluss der Reformpädagogik, stattgefunden, lässt das 19. Jahrhundert in Sachen Schulhausbau als rückständig erscheinen. Dabei wird vergessen, dass in dieser Zeit, gerade was die Zahl der gebauten Schulhäuser und die Entwicklung von Normen betrifft, eine intensive Arbeit geleistet wurde, die unter den historischen Umständen innovativ war. Die Organisation des Unterrichts, Licht und Luft im Schulzimmer und die Gesundheit der Schulkinder haben bereits das frühe 19. Jahrhundert normativ, praktisch und technisch beschäftigt. Gegen Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts findet eine über institutionelle und kantonale Grenzen hinausgehende öffentliche Diskussion statt, die breit rezipiert und professionalisiert wird. Verschiedene professionelle Akteure knüpfen an vorangegangene normative Debatten, staatliche Regulative, bestehende Traditionen und historische Kontexte an, um unterschiedlich motivierte, von Professionalisierungsprozessen beeinflusste Ansprüche an den Schulhausbau zu legitimieren, bis das Schulhaus zum „geheimen Miterzieher“ stilisiert wird.

Victims of War must be loyal to deserve protection: International law and national legislation on enemy aliens 1907-1918

In international law the internment of civilians has only been regulated in writing in the context of the 4th Geneva Convention of 1949. Nevertheless this did not mean that civilians were not protected by at least some rules of customary international law before that date and especially in World War I. Furthermore specialists of international law expected states – at least those considered to be part of the community of civilized nations – to continue to treat all men equal before the law even in wartime. As research already conducted (Bird, Panayi, Fischer) has shown, this was not the case during World War I. Based on these findings the presentation proposed here wants to look into the development of international law and into some national preparations for treating so called “enemy aliens” in the period before 1914 (Austria-Hungary, Australia, United Kingdom), in order to see to what extent principles of international law protecting civilians from the consequences of war can be detected in the pre-war preparations. As far as can be judged so far the issue of loyalty was central in this context. Looking at the war itself, the presentation proposed here will try to look at how far the principles of international law alluded to above continued to influence the policies on “enemy aliens” in the countries mentioned and to see, how the International Committee of the Red Cross tried to use them to legitimize and expand its protective policies in regard to civilians interned in belligerent as well as neutral countries throughout the war.

The sleeper effect: Artifact or phenomenon—A brief comment on Bell et al. (2013)

OBJECTIVE: Bell, Marcus, and Goodlad (2013) recently conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled additive trials and found that adding an additional component to an existing treatment vis-à-vis the existing treatment produced larger effect sizes on targeted outcomes at 6-months follow-up than at termination, an effect they labeled as a sleeper effect. One of the limitations with Bell et al.'s detection of the sleeper effect was that they did not conduct a statistical test of the size of the effect at follow-up versus termination. METHOD: To statistically test if the differences of effect sizes between the additive conditions and the control conditions at follow-up differed from those at termination, we used a restricted maximum-likelihood random-effect model with known variances to conduct a multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis (k = 30). RESULTS: Although the small effects at termination detected by Bell et al. were replicated (ds = 0.17-0.23), none of the analyses of growth from termination to follow-up produced statistically significant effects (ds < 0.08; p > .20), and when asymmetry was considered using trim-and-fill procedure or the studies after 2000 were analyzed, magnitude of the sleeper effect was negligible (d = 0.00). CONCLUSION: There is no empirical evidence to support the sleeper effect.