The sonic hedgehog signaling pathway and the development of pharyngeal arch Derivatives in Haplochromis piceatus, a Lake Victoria cichlid

Objectives Pharyngeal arches develop in the head and neck regions, and give rise to teeth, oral jaws, the hyoid bone, operculum, gills, and pharyngeal jaws in teleosts. In this study, the expression patterns of genes in the sonic hedgehog (shh), wnt, ectodysplasin A (eda), and bone morphogenetic protein (bmp) pathways were investigated in the pharyngeal arches of Haplochromis piceatus, one of the Lake Victoria cichlids. Furthermore, the role of the shh pathway in pharyngeal arch development in H. piceatus larvae was investigated. Methods The expression patterns of lymphocyte enhancer binding factor 1 (lef1), ectodysplasin A receptor (edar), shh, patched 1 (ptch1), bmp4, sp5 transcription factor (sp5), sclerostin domain containing 1a (sostdc1a), and dickkopf 1 (dkk1) were investigated in H. piceatus larvae by in situ hybridization. The role of the shh pathway was investigated through morphological phenotypic characterization after its inhibition. Results We found that lef1, edar, shh, ptch1, bmp4, dkk1, sostdc1a, and sp5 were expressed not only in the teeth, but also in the operculum and gill filaments of H piceatus larvae. After blocking the shh pathway using cyclopamine, we observed ectopic shh expression and the disappearance of ptch1 expression. After six weeks of cyclopamine treatment, an absence of teeth in the oral upper jaws and a poor outgrowth of premaxilla, operculum, and gill filaments in juvenile H. piceatus were observed. Conclusions These results suggest that the shh pathway is important for the development of pharyngeal arch derivatives such as teeth, premaxilla, operculum, and gill filaments in H. piceatus.

Management of floating thrombus in the aortic arch

OBJECTIVE Floating aortic thrombus is an underrecognized source of systemic emboli and carries a life-threatening risk of stroke when located in the aortic arch. Optimal treatment is not established in available guidelines. We report our experience in managing floating thrombi in the aortic arch. METHODS Consecutive patients diagnosed with a floating aortic arch thrombus at a tertiary referral center between January 2008 and December 2014 were reviewed. Perioperative and midterm outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Ten patients (8 female) with a median age of 56 years (range, 47-82 years) were identified. Eight patients presented with a symptomatic embolic event, and 2 patients were asymptomatic. One patient presenting with stroke due to embolic occlusion of all supra-aortic vessels died 2 days after admission. Three patients (2 asymptomatic and 1 unfit for surgery) were treated conservatively by anticoagulation, leading to thrombus resolution in 2 patients. In the third patient, the thrombus persisted despite anticoagulation, resulting in recurrent embolic events. The remaining 6 patients underwent open thrombectomy of the aortic arch during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. All patients treated by surgery had an uneventful postoperative course with no recurrent thrombus or embolic event during follow-up. Median follow-up of all patients was 17 months (range, 11-89 months). CONCLUSIONS Floating aortic arch thrombus is a dangerous source of systemic emboli. Surgical removal of the thrombus is easy to perform and followed by good clinical results. Conservative treatment with anticoagulation may be considered in asymptomatic, inoperable or high-risk patients.