Eluding oblivion with smart stochastic selection of synaptic updates

The variables involved in the equations that describe realistic synaptic dynamics always vary in a limited range. Their boundedness makes the synapses forgetful, not for the mere passage of time, but because new experiences overwrite old memories. The forgetting rate depends on how many synapses are modified by each new experience: many changes means fast learning and fast forgetting, whereas few changes means slow learning and long memory retention. Reducing the average number of modified synapses can extend the memory span at the price of a reduced amount of information stored when a new experience is memorized. Every trick which allows to slow down the learning process in a smart way can improve the memory performance. We review some of the tricks that allow to elude fast forgetting (oblivion). They are based on the stochastic selection of the synapses whose modifications are actually consolidated following each new experience. In practice only a randomly selected, small fraction of the synapses eligible for an update are actually modified. This allows to acquire the amount of information necessary to retrieve the memory without compromising the retention of old experiences. The fraction of modified synapses can be further reduced in a smart way by changing synapses only when it is really necessary, i.e. when the post-synaptic neuron does not respond as desired. Finally we show that such a stochastic selection emerges naturally from spike driven synaptic dynamics which read noisy pre and post-synaptic neural activities. These activities can actually be generated by a chaotic system.

Does aortic crossclamping during the cooling phase affect the early clinical outcome of acute type A aortic dissection?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of crossclamping the ascending aorta in acute type A aortic dissection during the cooling phase for deep hypothermic arrest on early clinical outcome. METHODS: The records of 275 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were reviewed. Ten patients have been excluded. Overall, 265 patients who underwent surgery under deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest in the "open technique" were divided retrospectively into two groups: those who underwent surgery with crossclamping of the ascending aorta during the cooling phase at the begin of the procedure (group 1, n = 191; 72.1 %) and those in whom the aorta was not clamped (group 2, n = 74; 27.9 %). RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups. In group 1, femoral artery cannulation, composite graft repair, and aortic arch replacement were significantly more frequent. In-hospital mortality was 15.2 % in group 1 and 17.6 % in group 2 (P = not significant). Neurologic deficits were observed in 9.4% in group 1 and in 10.8% in group 2 (= not significant). There were no significant differences in clinical outcome between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both options, aortic crossclamping or noclamping, may be used during the induction of deep hypothermia to repair acute type A aortic dissections with similar early clinical outcome. For the selection of the most appropriate technique, we recommend case by case evaluation, weighing the potential risks and benefits of aortic crossclamping.