47 resultados para scenario clustering
Resumo:
AIMS: Multiple arrhythmia re-inductions were recently shown in His-Purkinje system (HPS) ventricular tachycardia (VT). We hypothesized that HPS VT was a frequent mechanism of repetitive or incessant VT and assessed diagnostic criteria to select patients likely to have HPS VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with clustering VT episodes (>3 sustained monomorphic VT within 2 weeks) were included in the analysis. HPS VT was considered plausible in patients with (i) impaired left ventricular function associated with dilated cardiomyopathy or valvular heart disease; or (ii) ECG during VT similar to sinus rhythm QRS or to bundle-branch block QRS. HPS VT was plausible in 12 of 48 patients and HPS VT was demonstrated in 6 of 12 patients (50%, or 13% of the whole study group). Median VT cycle length was 318 ms (250-550). Catheter ablation was successful in all six patients. CONCLUSION: His-Purkinje system VT is found in a significant number of patients with repetitive or incessant VT episodes, and in a large proportion of patients with predefined clinical or electrocardiographic characteristics. Since it is easily amenable to catheter ablation, our data support the screening of all patients with repetitive VT in this regard and an invasive approach in a selected group of patients.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: The single-use supraglottic airway devices LMA-Supreme (LMA-S; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, United Kingdom) and i-gel (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom) have a second tube for gastric tube insertion. Only the LMA-S has an inflatable cuff. They have the same clinical indications and might be useful for difficult airway management. This prospective, crossover, randomized controlled trial was performed in a simulated difficult airway scenario using an extrication collar limiting mouth opening and neck movement. METHODS: Sixty patients were included. Both devices were placed in random order in each patient. Primary outcome was overall success rate. Other measurements were time to successful ventilation, airway leak pressure, fiberoptic glottic view, and adverse events. RESULTS: Success rate for the LMA-S was 95% versus 93% for the i-gel (P = 1.000). LMA-S needed shorter insertion time (34 +/- 12 s vs. 42 +/- 23 s, P = 0.024). Tidal volumes and airway leak pressure were similar (LMA-S 26 +/- 8 cm H20; i-gel 27 +/- 9 cm H20; P = 0.441). Fiberoptic view through the i-gel showed less epiglottic downfolding. Overall agreement in insertion outcome was 54 (successes) and 1 (failure) or 55 (92%) of 60 patients. The difference in success rate was 1.7% (95% CI -11.3% to 7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Both airway devices had similar insertion success and clinical performance in the simulated difficult airway situation. The authors found less epiglottic downfolding and better fiberoptic view but longer insertion time with the i-gel. Our study shows that both devices are feasible for emergency airway management in patients with reduced neck movement and limited mouth opening.
Resumo:
Prevotella nigrescens, Prevotella intermedia and Porphyromonas gingivalis are oral pathogens from the family Bacteroidaceae, regularly isolated from cases of gingivitis and periodontitis. In this study, the phylogenetic variability of these three bacterial species was investigated by means of 16S rRNA (rrs) gene sequence comparisons of a set of epidemiologically and geographically diverse isolates. For each of the three species, the rrs gene sequences of 11 clinical isolates as well as the corresponding type strains was determined. Comparison of all rrs sequences obtained with those of closely related species revealed a clear clustering of species, with only a little intraspecies variability but a clear difference in the rrs gene with respect to the next related taxon. The results indicate that the three species form stable, homogeneous genetic groups, which favours an rrs-based species identification of these oral pathogens. This is especially useful given the 7% sequence divergence between Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens, since phenotypic distinction between the two Prevotella species is inconsistent or involves techniques not applicable in routine identification.