Das radikale Milieu in Russland vor 1917 als "imperiale Gegenelite"

Im Russischen Reich bildete sich ab den 1860er Jahren im Untergrund eine radikale Gegenelite heraus, welche die bisher geltenden Autoritäten, Konventionen und Werte in Frage stellte und durch etwas Besseres ersetzen wollte. In diesen Netzwerken fanden vor allem junge Menschen aus dem europäischen Teil des Russischen Reiches zusammen. Nationale Identitäten schienen sekundär. Russisch diente als Verständigungssprache. Entscheidend für die Aufnahme in diese Gegengesellschaft war einerseits die „persönliche Qualifikation“, andererseits eine gewisse schulische Bildung. Die verschiedensten radikalen Netzwerke können als Gesamtheit mit dem Begriff radikales Milieu gefasst werden. Dabei lehne ich mich an den Milieubegriff des Soziologen M. Rainer Lepsius an. Dieser definierte Milieus als „soziale Einheiten, die durch eine Koinzidenz mehrerer Strukturdimensionen […] gebildet werden.“ (Demokratie in Deutschland, 1993, 38). Die Strukturdimensionen des radikalen Milieus in Russland von den 1860er Jahren bis 1917 waren: a) Intellektuelle, meist „privilegierte“, städtische Mitglieder, b) Organisation in Zirkeln, c) eine Identität als Gegengesellschaft mit Gegenwerten, die eine Gegenrealität aufbaute sowie d) die Zugehörigkeit durch Kooptation. Obwohl sie den autokratischen Staat ablehnten, organisierten sich die Radikalen aber im imperialen Raum; ihre soziale Zusammensetzung spiegelte mit bestimmten Einschränkungen die ethnische und soziale Pluralität des Gesamtreiches wieder. In ihren autobiographischen Texten deuteten sich die Radikalen als „imperiale Gegenelite“. Dabei lässt sich auch ein Gefälle zwischen Zentrum und Peripherie feststellen: Die führenden Zirkel befanden sich meist in den grossen Städten des Reiches wie St. Petersburg, Moskau und Kiew oder im Exil und waren von dort aus gegenüber den Sympathisanten in den Provinzstädten oder gegenüber den Verbannten in Sibirien bei der Setzung interner Diskurse wegweisend.

A catalog of high-impact windstorms in Switzerland since 1859

In recent decades, extremely hazardous windstorms have caused enormous losses to buildings, infrastructure and forests in Switzerland. This has increased societal and scientific interest in the intensity and frequency of historical high-impact storms. However, high-resolution wind data and damage statistics mostly span recent decades only. For this study, we collected quantitative (e.g., volumes of windfall timber, losses relating to buildings) and descriptive (e.g., forestry or insurance reports) information on the impact of historical windstorms. To define windstorm severity, normalized and declustered quantitative data were processed by extreme value statistics. Descriptive information was classified using a conceptual guideline. Validation with independent damage information, as well as comparison with wind measurements and a reanalysis, indicates that the most hazardous winter storms are captured, while too few moderate windstorms are detected. Strong storms in the wind measurements and reanalysis are thus added to the catalog. The final catalog encompasses approximately 240 high-impact windstorms in Switzerland since 1859. It features three robust severity classes and contains eight extreme windstorms. Evidence of high winter storm activity in the early and late 20th century compared to the mid-20th century in both damage and wind data indicates a co-variability of hazard and related damage on decadal timescales.

From the Sea to Paris and back: On the interdependence of economic warfare, weather conditions and the submarine campaign 1916-1917

Starting of from Avner Offer’s comment that the First World War was not only a war of steel and gold, but also of bread and potatoes (1989: 1) and my own research on British as well as Australian preparations for economic warfare and based on sources from the entente as well as the central powers but also from the United States, Canada and Australia, may presentation will focus on the interdependence of the measures taken by entente as well as central power authorities in the second half of 1916. Already a year before both sides had become aware that this war would not only be decided on the battlefield, but that the issues of primary as well as secondary resources would be decisive. Accordingly measures that could strike the enemy in this field were discussed and put into place more and more and this at time, when weather conditions caused a reduction of harvest all over Europe, Northern America and Argentina.

Mutation Update of the CLCN5 Gene Responsible for Dent Disease 1

Dent disease is a rare X-linked tubulopathy characterized by low molecular weight proteinuria, hypercalciuria, nephrocalcinosis and/or nephrolithiasis, progressive renal failure, and variable manifestations of other proximal tubule dysfunctions. It often progresses over a few decades to chronic renal insufficiency, and therefore molecular characterization is important to allow appropriate genetic counseling. Two genetic subtypes have been described to date: Dent disease 1 is caused by mutations of the CLCN5 gene, coding for the chloride/proton exchanger ClC-5; and Dent disease 2 by mutations of the OCRL gene, coding for the inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase OCRL-1. Herein, we review previously reported mutations (n = 192) and their associated phenotype in 377 male patients with Dent disease 1 and describe phenotype and novel (n = 42) and recurrent mutations (n = 24) in a large cohort of 117 Dent disease 1 patients belonging to 90 families. The novel missense and in-frame mutations described were mapped onto a three-dimensional homology model of the ClC-5 protein. This analysis suggests that these mutations affect the dimerization process, helix stability, or transport. The phenotype of our cohort patients supports and extends the phenotype that has been reported in smaller studies.

In Memoriam: Herbert E Wright Jr 1917-2015

Herbert E Wright Jr was one of the foremost Quaternary scientists of the last century. He made wide ranging contributions to our understanding of the late-Quaternary of North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. This was based largely on reconstructing palaeoenvironments from lake sediments and included the important implications for glacial, vegetational, fire and climatic history, geoarchaeology and conservation. Many of his inter-disciplinary research projects involved fieldwork with his graduate students and co-workers from the University of Minnesota where he created and led the renowned Limnological Research Center. Perhaps his most outstanding contribution was as an instigator of the Co-operative Holocene Mapping Project (COHMAP). This triggered a paradigm shift in Holocene climatic research involving the comparison of climate-model simulations of past climates with palaeoclimatic data.